Pubdate: Mon, 30 Nov 2009
Source: Hartford Courant (CT)
Copyright: 2009 The Hartford Courant
Contact: http://drugsense.org/url/IpIfHam4
Website: http://www.courant.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/183
Author: George F. Will
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/author/George+Will (George Will)

'MEDICAL' MARIJUANA INVITES ABUSE

The U.S. Justice Department recently announced that federal laws 
against marijuana would not be enforced for possession of marijuana 
that conforms to states' laws. In 2000, Colorado legalized medical 
marijuana.  Since the Justice Department's decision, the average age 
of the 400 persons a day seeking "prescriptions" at Colorado's 
multiplying medical marijuana dispensaries has fallen precipitously. 
Many new customers are college students.

Customers -- this, not patients, is what most really are -- tell 
doctors at the dispensaries that they suffer from insomnia, anxiety, 
headaches, premenstrual syndrome, "chronic pain," whatever, and pay 
nominal fees for "prescriptions." Most really just want to smoke pot.

So says Colorado's attorney general, John Suthers, an honest and 
thoughtful man trying to save his state from institutionalizing such 
hypocrisy. His dilemma is becoming commonplace: 13 states have, and 
15 more are considering, laws permitting medical use of marijuana.

Realizing they could not pass legalization of marijuana, some people 
who favor that campaigned to amend Colorado's Constitution to 
legalize sales for medicinal purposes. Marijuana has medical uses -- 
e.g., to control nausea caused by chemotherapy -- but the helpful 
ingredients can be conveyed with other medicines. Medical marijuana 
was legalized but, Suthers says, no serious regime was then developed 
to regulate who could buy or grow it. Colorado's probable future has 
unfolded in California, which in 1996 legalized sales of marijuana to 
persons with doctors' "prescriptions."

Fifty-six percent of Californians support legalization, and Roger 
Parloff reports ("How Marijuana Became Legal" in the Sept. 28 
Fortune) that they essentially have this. A Los Angeles city 
councilman estimates that there are about 600 dispensaries in the 
city. If so, they outnumber Starbucks stores.

Colorado's medical marijuana dispensaries have hired lobbyists to 
seek taxation and regulation, for the same reason Nevada's brothel 
industry wants to be taxed and regulated by the state: The Nevada 
Brothel Association regards taxation as legitimation and insurance 
against prohibition as the booming state's frontier mentality recedes.

State governments, misunderstanding markets and ravenous for 
revenues, exaggerate the potential windfall from taxing legalized 
marijuana. California thinks it might reap $1.4 billion. But Rosalie 
Pacula, a RAND Corp. economist, estimates that prohibition raises 
marijuana production costs at least 400 percent, so legalization 
would cause prices to fall much more than the 50 percent the $1.4 
billion estimate assumes.

Furthermore, marijuana is a normal good in that demand for it varies 
with price. Legalization, by drastically lowering price, will 
increase marijuana's public health costs, including mental and 
respiratory problems, and motor vehicle accidents.

States attempting to use high taxes to keep marijuana prices 
artificially high would leave a large market for much cheaper illegal 
- -- unregulated and untaxed -- marijuana. So revenues (and law 
enforcement savings) would depend on the price falling close to the 
cost of production. In the 1990s, a mere $2 per pack difference 
between U.S. and Canadian cigarette prices created such a smuggling 
problem that Canada repealed a cigarette tax increase.

Suthers has multiple drug-related worries. Colorado ranks sixth in 
the nation in identity theft, two-thirds of which is driven by the 
state's $1.4 billion annual methamphetamine addiction. He is loath to 
see complete legalization of marijuana at a moment when new methods 
of cultivation are producing plants in which the active ingredient, 
THC, is "seven, eight times as concentrated" as it used to be.

Furthermore, he was pleasantly surprised when a survey of nonusing 
young people revealed that health concerns did not explain nonuse. 
The main explanation was the law: "We underestimate the number of 
people who care that something is illegal."

But they will care less as law itself loses its dignity. By mocking 
the idea of lawful behavior, legalization of medical marijuana may be 
more socially destructive than full legalization.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake