Pubdate: Thu, 25 Sep 2008
Source: Brown Daily Herald, The (Brown, RI Edu)
Copyright: 2008 The Brown Daily Herald
Contact:  http://www.browndailyherald.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/727
Author: Sarah Husk
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Jeffrey+Miron

ECONOMIST SPEAKS AGAINST 'JUST SAY NO'

Libertarian Favors Legalization

After growing up with "Just Say No" with television commercials 
imploring them to be "Above the Influence," today's college students 
have spent their youths grounded in America's so-called "war on 
drugs." But on Tuesday night, students filled List Auditorium to hear 
one man's take on exactly why the whole campaign makes no sense.

Jeffrey Miron, Harvard economics professor, outspoken libertarian and 
staunch advocate of drug legalization, told his audience that since 
his positions tend to be unpopular, he gets a "weird feeling" when an 
audience agrees with him.

Miron focused his lecture on deconstructing the liberal and 
libertarian arguments on drug policy, and differentiating them on the 
basis of liberals' interest in decriminalization versus libertarians' 
agenda to legalize them completely.

The main difference, he said, is that liberals, while "happy to 
defend the rights of someone who uses drugs," are not as interested 
in legalizing the market to protect sellers. This, Miron said, is 
"just bizarre" and "illogical" to libertarians.

"Decriminalization is not going to get rid of the problems," Miron 
said, citing issues that would remain problematic even under 
decriminalization, such as questionable quality control, 
infringements on civil liberties and violent tensions between rival 
drug dealers.

On the other hand, libertarians, Miron said, believe in the 
legalization of "all drugs - no exceptions."

And while he said that he was against most legal restrictions on the 
sale, purchase and use of drugs, he acknowledged that it's not 
practical to "legalize marijuana like toothpaste."

But where liberals would call for a heavy "sin tax," so as to provide 
an obstacle to use, libertarians are skeptical. Under the rationale 
that drugs have a negative impact on society, Miron said, "almost 
anything" from Sudafed to late night TV could carry similar effects.

Miron also addressed several other aspects of regulation, such as age 
restrictions and parameters for ethical advertising. Both of these 
can make decriminalization more palatable, he said, but added that 
neither is in line with the libertarian viewpoint that "says, 'Let 
people do what they want and let them bear the consequences.'"

Drug use, he added, is "shrouded in this mystery." He ascribed this 
attitude to his belief that the federal government has "hyperbolized" 
drug use, an action that he said ultimately "just makes them look like idiots."

Miron admitted that the legalization of drugs would almost certainly 
lead to an increase in casual users and more experimentation.

"If (cocaine) were legal, I would try it," he said, to "see what the 
fuss has been about for the last 85 or 90 years."

But Miron also acknowledged that his viewpoint is considered extreme 
and is not likely to be taken up any time soon by politicians.

"There are no votes to be gotten for a politician who's soft on 
drugs," he said as a means of explaining why he believes the issue 
hasn't been on the forefront of the American political scene.

Still, he said, in comparison to the United States, other countries 
have taken much greater strides toward the decriminalization, and in 
some cases legalization, of drugs. He pointed to European countries 
like the Netherlands and Spain as well as smaller-scale efforts in 
Canada and Latin America.

When it comes to drug prohibition, he said, "the U.S. has always been 
the most extreme."

Ben Mossbarger '10, president of Students for Sensible Drug Policy, 
one of the groups sponsoring the lecture, said that the group thought 
"a new perspective was really necessary."

It's important to realize that "it's not just one group of people 
trying to legalize drugs," Mossbarger said. He added that he thought 
the lecture "helped people construct two-sided arguments" about the issue.

Gregory Anderson '10 added that it "brought up new questions in 
people's minds."

In addition to SSDP, the lecture was sponsored by the Brown Spectator 
and the Brown College Republicans.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake