Pubdate: Sat, 5 Apr 2008
Source: Los Angeles Times (CA)
Copyright: 2008 Los Angeles Times
Contact:  http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/248
Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n348/a07.html
Author: Adam Gelb

IMPRISONMENT'S HIGH PRICE

Re "Do the time, lower the crime," Opinion, March 30

There is no doubt that putting more people in prison over the last 25
years has helped cut the crime rate, as James Q. Wilson contends. But
with one in 100 adults now behind bars and states facing
billion-dollar deficits, the more relevant question is: Are there more
cost-effective ways to enhance public safety?

Several states are finding there are. Texas has residential treatment
facilities for low-level, nonviolent offenders with drug problems.
Kansas gives grants to jurisdictions that hold probation violators
accountable without taking up state prison cells. Wilson cites the
Hawaii HOPE program as an effective approach -- swift and certain but
short jail terms for probationers who fail drug tests. This is
precisely the point of our report: ensure enough prison beds for
violent and career criminals in part by using more cost-effective
strategies to successfully manage offenders who pose less risk.

Prisons can reduce crime, but as Wilson notes, three-quarters of the
nation's recent crime drop was because of other factors. Policymakers
must explore all options for increasing public safety and deliver the
highest possible return for taxpayer dollars.

Adam Gelb

Washington

The writer directs the Public Safety Performance Project at the Pew
Charitable Trusts. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake