Pubdate: Thu, 26 Jul 2007
Source: Tallahassee Democrat (FL)
Copyright: 2007 Tallahassee Democrat.
Contact:  http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/democrat/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/444
Author: Harold Jackson,  Philadelphia Inquirer
Note: Prints email address for LTEs sent by email

STUFFING PRISONS WITH BLACK MEN

One of my four brothers graduated from the University of Iowa, but
being a black male, I don't think I want to spend too much time in the
Hawkeye State.

Only about 2 percent of Iowa's population is black, but blacks are
13.6 times more likely than whites to be imprisoned there. That's more
than twice the national average, which is bad enough. Hispanics
nationally are imprisoned at double the rate of whites.

I shouldn't pick on Iowa, though. I live in New Jersey, where blacks
are imprisoned at 10 times the rate of whites. Over in Pennsylvania,
it's five times.

You would think the disparities would be worse in the Old South. But
in Alabama, Mississippi and Georgia, where blacks make up larger parts
of the population, they are only about three times more likely to be
imprisoned than whites. (Editor's note: In Florida blacks are 4.4
times more likely to be imprisoned than whites.)

These incarceration statistics, released last week by the Sentencing
Project, a research and advocacy group that promotes alternatives to
prison, are sure to prompt recitations of that old Richard Pryor joke:
I went to the courthouse to find justice, and that's exactly what I
found: Just us!

But it's not funny.

The racists among us, blatant and closeted, will be quick to attribute
the imprisonment disparity to the misguided belief that blacks are
inherently prone to criminality. I've seen no valid studies supporting
that view. But numerous scholars have correlated crime to conditions
of poverty - and blacks remain disproportionately poor.

In that regard, conditions are better but still similar for many
blacks to what sociologist W.E.B. DuBois observed when he researched
"The Philadelphia Negro," published in 1899.

"We have had a period of financial distress and industrial
depression," DuBois wrote. "The ones who have felt this most are the
poor, the unskilled laborers, the inefficient and the unfortunate, and
those with small social and economic advantages; the Negroes are in
this class, and the result has been an increase in Negro crime and
pauperism."

DuBois said crime is "the open rebellion of an individual against his
social environment," an environment with "homes badly situated and
badly managed, with parents untrained for their responsibilities; the
influence of social surroundings which by poor laws and inefficient
administration leave the bad to be made worse."

Sure sounds like parts of almost any big city and even some rural
areas.

But the relationship of poverty to crime isn't the only reason for the
discrepancy between black and white incarceration rates. Prejudice
still plays a role, as it did in DuBois' day.

"In convictions by human courts the rich always are favored somewhat
at the expense of the poor, the upper classes at the expense of the
unfortunate classes, and whites at the expense of Negroes," he wrote.

DuBois noted that what we would call white-collar crimes today -
forgery, embezzlement - were not prosecuted with the same vigor 100
years ago in a "commercial community" like Philadelphia. Lesser crimes
such as "petty thieving, breaches of the peace, and personal assault
and burglary" received more severe punishment.

Today's parallel might be in the inequitable prosecution of drug
crimes, a major factor for the racial discrepancies in U.S. prison
incarceration rates.

According to Human Rights Watch, two out of every five blacks sent to
state prisons nationally in 2000 were convicted of drug crimes.
Although blacks constitute no more than 15 percent of all drug users,
63 percent of drug offenders sent to state prisons were black.

Why that discrepancy? Studies show the majority of drug offenders sent
to prison in the last decade were convicted of low-level drug
possession or sales. Where do most of those arrests occur? In
low-income neighborhoods populated largely by blacks.

Why? Because it's much easier to make a bust in poor neighborhoods
where drugs are sold in open markets than in suburban neighborhoods
where drug abuse is largely hidden.

It's not that blacks are more likely to abuse drugs. The National
Household Survey on Drug Abuse says whites make up about 72 percent of
America's illegal drug users; blacks, 15 percent. But blacks are most
likely to be caught and sent to prison.

Criminal behavior should be prosecuted wherever it occurs. But easing
the poverty that afflicts too many minority communities would have a
profound effect on reducing the crime within them. That will take more
jobs and better education to qualify for jobs.

In the meantime, more drug treatment programs and more sentencing
alternatives for nonviolent criminals makes more sense than building
prison after prison for members of a community targeted more for where
they live than for what they have done.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Derek