Pubdate: Fri, 27 Apr 2007
Source: Chico Enterprise-Record (CA)
Copyright: 2007 The Media News Group
Contact: http://www.chicoer.com/feedback
Website: http://www.chicoer.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/861
Note: Does not print letters from outside circulation area
Author: Terry Vau Dell, Staff Writer Chico Enterprise-Record
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Marijuana - Medicinal)

BUTTE'S MEDICAL POT POLICY CHALLENGED

OROVILLE -- A legal showdown is looming in Butte County over whether 
people who grow medical marijuana can be prosecuted for providing the 
herb to others too sick or otherwise unable to grow it themselves.

District Attorney Mike Ramsey has established "guidelines" that 
require all members of medical marijuana cooperatives to "actively 
participate in the cultivation" process.

Attorneys for several medical marijuana growers contend the local 
policy conflicts with state law and are challenging it in court.

Another lawsuit on the issue is also pending.

Attorneys for a Butte County man said Thursday he will seek dismissal 
of felony pot cultivation charges on grounds that the court "lacks 
jurisdiction" to prosecute a member of a medical marijuana coalition.

The defendant in that case, Robert Gordon Rasmussen, 22, has also 
filed a civil writ asserting that his incarceration was illegal, as 
is the "underground" local policy behind it.

Rasmussen was arrested earlier this month after Butte County 
sheriff's deputies allegedly found more than 100 marijuana plants of 
various sizes growing inside the defendant's home. Deputies had gone 
to the house after getting a complaint about a dog. One of the 
officers said he could smell marijuana in the residence.

Rasmussen told the deputies he was growing medical marijuana as a 
member of a legal patient collective. All the co-op's members had 
doctor's recommendations, according to court documents.

Gordon Dise, who describes himself as a "legal strategist and local 
activist," filed a writ of habeas corpus on Rasmussen's behalf, 
alleging the arrest was unlawful and that efforts by police to force 
Rasmussen to identify others in the collective violated their rights 
to privacy and subjected Rasmussen to a potential lawsuit if he complied.

Dise appeared in court Thursday, but because his writ petition had 
not been placed on the calendar, Judge Sandra McLean declined to hear it.

The judge has set a hearing in mid-June to consider a related defense 
motion to dismiss the charges against Rasmussen.

Omar Figueroa, a San Francisco lawyer who represents Rasmussen, said 
outside of court he will argue that his client had "immunity against 
prosecution" because he was both a medical marijuana patient and part 
of a lawful collective.

Deputy district attorney Michael Candela on Thursday said he would 
not have a comment until he received Figueroa's written motion.

The prosecutor referred policy questions regarding medical marijuana 
co-ops to Ramsey, who was out of the office until today, according to 
his answering service.

Proposition 215, the 1996 initiative that legalized cultivation and 
use of medical marijuana with a doctor's recommendation in 
California, left open for several years the question of how persons 
who were unable to grow pot themselves could lawfully obtain it.

In 2003, the Legislature passed Senate Bill 420, which, among other 
things, authorized voluntary distribution of medical marijuana cards 
and permitted patients to "associate ... in order to collectively or 
cooperatively cultivate marijuana for medical purposes."

It also set a personal limit for each patient of either eight ounces 
of dried marijuana or six mature or 12 immature pot plants.

Saying it wanted to "end any confusion" the new law might raise, the 
Butte County District Attorney's Office subsequently published a set 
of written "guidelines" for local medical marijuana co-ops.

Among other things, it requires each member of a collective or co-op 
to be identified and to "actively participate in the cultivation" 
process. Co-ops must document each member's "contribution of labor or 
resources" and not distribute to anyone outside of the co-op.

Joseph Elford, San Francisco attorney for Americans for Safe Access 
- -- a pro-medical marijuana organization, has sued the Butte County 
Sheriff's Office, on behalf of an Oroville man, David Williams.

The suit claims the same sheriff's deputy involved in Rasmussen's 
bust, Jacob Hancock, on Oct. 3, 2005, threatened to arrest Williams 
if he didn't destroy all but 12 of the 41 marijuana plants the 
Oroville man claimed to be growing for a seven-member collective.

Like Rasmussen's attorney, Elford contends the local DA's policy on 
medical marijuana collectives "is completely contrary to the will of 
the people."

The lawsuit seeks general and punitive damages, plus an injunction 
barring the Sheriff's Office from "such unlawful seizures in the 
future" involving medical marijuana collectives in Butte County.

A hearing is expected to be set in a few weeks on a pre-trial motion 
by the county to dismiss the civil lawsuit on legal grounds.

[sidebar]

Background: State law allows people with doctors' recommendations to 
form collectives to grow medical marijuana.

What's New: Legal challenges have been filed against District 
Attorney Mike Ramsey's prohibition against collective members' 
growing pot for other members.

What's Next: A hearing will be set on the county's motion to dismiss 
the legal challenge. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake