Pubdate: Tue, 20 Mar 2007
Source: Daily Express (Malaysia)
Copyright: 2007 Daily Express
Contact: http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/feedback-form.cfm
Website: http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3635
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis)

DUO TO BE HANGED AFTER LOSING THEIR FINAL APPEALS

Kota Kinabalu: Two death row prisoners failed in their bid at the 
Federal Court here on Monday to reverse the death sentences imposed 
on them by the High Court.

Judge Datuk Bentara Istana Nik Hashim Nik Abd Rahman who sat with 
Judges Datuk Haji Hashim Datuk Haji Yusof and Datuk Azmel Haji Maamor 
unanimously dismissed the appeals by Mohamed Hj Muslimin, 34, and 
Basil Omar, 36, respectively.

The judges affirmed the death sentences by hanging imposed by the 
High Court which had also been affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

The court made the decisions after hearing submissions from the 
assigned counsel for both appelents Ram Singh and Deputy Public 
Prosecutors Mangaiarkarasi Krishnan and Samsudin Hassan.

Mohamad was convicted and sentenced to death by Sandakan High Court 
on May 3, 1995 for discharging a firearm, a .38 Smith & Wesson 
special revolver, with intent to cause death or hurt to one Corporal 
Paulinus Sabinus.

The charge is under Section 3 of the Firearms (Increased Penalty) Act 
1971 which carries the mandatory death sentence on conviction.

The offence took place on April 16, 1992, at about 7.30pm in front of 
Syarikat Emas Yuwang, Mile 21 /2 Jalan Labuk, Sandakan.

His appeal to the Court of Appeal on June 25, 1997 was rejected and 
his death sentence affirmed.

Ram had submitted six grounds for the court to consider Mohamad's appeal.

Among others, Ram, pointed out that the prosecution had failed to 
prove the intention of his client to cause death or hurt to the policeman.

He said it was only the evidence of Paulinus that Mohamad pointed the 
gun at him.

Ram also submitted that the prosecution had failed to call an 
'informer' to testify in the trial. A prosecution witness had told 
the trial that police was alerted of a robbery in progress at a goldsmith shop.

"Failure or omission by the prosecution to call the informer was 
fatal to the prosecution," Ram said.

DPP Mangaiarkarasi submitted, among others, that there were 
concurrent findings of facts by the trial court and the Court of Appeal.

"Although there is no written grounds of judgement of the Court of 
Appeal, the fact that the Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction and 
sentence passed by the High Court, clearly shows that the learned 
judges of the Court of Appeal agreed with the findings made by the 
learned High Court Judge, " she said.

Meanwhile, in Basil's case, he appealed that the conviction and 
sentence to be set aside or alternatively reduced to that of possession only.

Basil was sentenced to death by hanging by the Sandakan High Court on 
Sept 26, 1994 for trafficking 1,241gm of cannabis in a taxi in front 
of the general market in Sandakan on Jan 31, 1990.

He was charged under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 
which carries a mandatory death sentence.

On June 3, 2002 the Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction and 
sentence imposed by the High Court.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman