Pubdate: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 Source: North County Times (Escondido, CA) Copyright: 2007 North County Times Contact: http://www.nctimes.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1080 Author: Gig Conaughton, Staff Writer Note: Gives LTE priority to North San Diego County and Southwest Riverside County residents APPEAL CONTINUES IN COUNTY'S MEDICAL MARIJUANA CASE SAN DIEGO ---- San Diego County officials said last week that they have filed an appeal to continue their efforts to overturn California's voter-approved medical marijuana law ---- but judges could take months, a year, or longer to issue a ruling. Meanwhile, medical marijuana advocacy groups and patients offered a variety of opinions on what effect the county's continuing challenge was having locally and statewide. Some said they thought this county's appeal was making it easier for other counties to ignore state legislation ordering them to create medical marijuana identification cards and registry systems. But they also said they thought that the county's challenge was having less of an effect than it had before a Superior Court judge in December rejected the challenge, upholding the law that allows seriously ill people to use marijuana with a doctor's recommendation to ease their pain. However, a San Diego County medical marijuana patient, Wendy Christakes, said the county's continuing challenge, and crackdown on medical marijuana "dispensaries," was still generating local fallout. Christakes is a 29-year-old mother who has used marijuana since 2003 to treat chronic pain from herniated discs and removal of a portion of her backbone. She said local patients have been trying without success to get San Diego city leaders to allow dispensaries where patients can buy the drug. Christakes said she was convinced that the county's challenge was giving City Council members "an excuse to basically keep us on the back burner." Court rejection San Diego County supervisors angered local medical marijuana patients and state and national medical marijuana advocacy groups in December 2005 when they said they would sue to overturn Proposition 215 ---- the medical marijuana law that state voters passed with 56 percent of the vote in 1996. Supervisors said Prop. 215 is "bad law" and could increase drug abuse. The county argued that Prop. 215 should be pre-empted by federal law that says marijuana has no medicinal benefits and that all use was illegal. The federal government also states that synthetically created tetrahydrocannibinol, the active ingredient in marijuana, has medicinal value and can be prescribed by doctors. The county's challenge has national implications, patients and government officials say, because it marks the first time that any county has sued to overturn any of the medical marijuana laws that voters have approved in 11 states. Superior Court Judge William R. Nevitt ruled against the county in December. But county officials filed a notice of appeal to the state's Fourth Appellate District last month. Officials said they don't know how long the appeal process will take. Some have speculated six to 12 months, other legal experts say appeals can take up to 18 months. In the meantime, officials from some of the medical marijuana advocacy groups that have been watching said the county's continuing challenge could be giving other counties in the state a reason not to implement Senate Bill 420 ---- the medical marijuana identification card and registry law. Prop. 215 urged the state and federal government to work out a way to dispense medical marijuana to patients, but didn't fill out the details. In 2003, state legislators punted the issue over to local governments with SB 420, directing counties to create identification cards that would make it easier for law enforcement officers to identify patients. Officials from the Marijuana Policy Project said last week that only about half of California's 58 counties have implemented the identification card program. Chris Hermes of Americans for Safe Access, a group that wants to get the federal government to change its marijuana laws, said some of those counties had delayed action because the state recently threatened to greatly increase the proposed cost of the cards. But Hermes said he also thought the county's challenge was playing a part in some counties' delay. "One of the ramifications of what San Diego is doing by suing the state is to give political cover to other counties not to implement the (identification card) program," he said. San Diego County Supervisor Bill Horn, who pushed hard for the county to sue to overturn Prop. 215, agreed Friday. "I think they're right," Horn said. "The fact that we're suing has made it easier for other counties to say no." Dispensary crackdown Christakes, meanwhile, said one outcome of the county's continuing challenge has been the squeeze on medical marijuana dispensaries. In the wake of the county's decision to sue to overturn Prop. 215, it appeared that the county district attorney's office and Sheriff's Department became more aggressive in their posture toward the medical marijuana issue as well. In July 2006 ---- even though California Attorney General Bill Lockyer said local police were not obligated to help enforce federal laws that say all marijuana use is illegal ---- representatives of the San Diego County district attorney's office and sheriff's deputies joined raids on several dispensaries and arrested 10 people. Deputy District Attorney Damon Mosler, the county's top drug prosecutor, said this week that all local dispensaries had been shut down. Mosler said undercover police officers ---- who were not medical marijuana patients ---- were able to buy drugs at all of those dispensaries. However, Mosler also said that the county's belief is that the dispensaries are illegal even if they properly sell marijuana to patients. Hermes said that surveys suggest that the majority of medical marijuana patients statewide rely upon dispensaries because they would rather not, or can not, grow marijuana on their own. Christakes said she won't grow her own marijuana because she has small children at home. She said she also fears raids by federal drug agents. Christakes said that it has been more difficult for her to get marijuana since the county crackdown, even though California voters have said seriously ill people should be able to get it. She said she has had to go to the hospital more often to get morphine and Demerol drips to relieve her pain, but that she has tried not to use prescription medicines that she believes are more harmful than marijuana. Christakes is angry that the county has continued its challenge. "I just really think that it's just a waste of taxpayer money," she said. "They're deciding to interpret the law, instead of following the laws that voters and citizens approved." - --- MAP posted-by: Elaine