Pubdate: Sun, 30 Dec 2007
Source: Times Daily (Florence, AL)
Copyright: 2007 Times Daily
Contact:  http://www.timesdaily.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1641
Author: Cynthia Tucker
Note: Cynthia Tucker is editorial page editor for the Atlanta 
Journal-Constitution.

WAR ON DRUGS IS FAILING

Doing the Same Thing Over and Over and Expecting a Different Result.

You don't hear much about the nation's "war on drugs" these days. 
It's a has-been, a holdover from bygone days. Its glitz has been 
stolen by the "war on terror," which gets the news media hype and 
campaign trail rhetoric. Railing against recreational drug use and 
demanding that offenders be locked away is so '90s.

But the drug war proceeds, mostly away from news cameras, still 
chewing up federal and state resources and casting criminal sanctions 
over entire neighborhoods. Some four decades into an intensive effort 
to stamp out recreational drug use, billions of dollars have been 
spent; thousands of criminals, many of them foreigners, have been 
enriched; and hundreds of thousands of Americans have been 
imprisoned. And the use of illegal drugs continues unabated.

With the nation poised on the brink of a new political era, isn't it 
time to abandon the wrongheaded war on drugs? Isn't it time to admit 
that this second Prohibition has been as big a failure as the last - 
the one aimed at alcohol? Every war has its collateral damage, and 
the war on drugs is no different. As it happens, its unintended 
victims have been disproportionately black. The stunning rise in 
incarceration rates for black men began after the nation became 
serious about stamping out recreational drug use.

In 1954, black inmates accounted for 30 percent of the nation's 
prison population, according to Marc Mauer, assistant director of The 
Sentencing Project. Fifty years later, he wrote, blacks account for 
almost half of all prison admissions. Much of that increase has come 
from arrests for drug crimes. Few of those black men are wildly 
successful drug lords like Harlem kingpin Frank Lucas, portrayed by 
Denzel Washington in the film "American Gangster." Instead, they are 
usually penny-ante dealers addicted to their product.

As violent crime dropped in the '90s, some law-and-order types argued 
that the harsh penalties meted out under punitive drug laws were 
responsible for safer streets. But that argument is seriously 
undermined by a resurgence in violent crime, even as drug arrests 
continue. While violent offenders such as Frank Lucas deserve hefty 
prison sentences, there is no justification for lengthy sentences for 
nonviolent drug offenders.

Recently, criminal justice officials have begun to tacitly 
acknowledge the racism embedded in the drug war. Earlier this month, 
the U.S. Sentencing Commission, which sets federal sentencing 
guidelines, retroactively reduced the penalties for some crimes 
related to crack cocaine, reducing the disparity between sentences 
for crack cocaine, used more frequently by blacks, and powder 
cocaine, more often used by whites. A day earlier, the U.S. Supreme 
Court had ruled that judges could deviate from harsh guidelines in 
sentencing drug offenders.

But the ravages of the drug war are too many to be eased by those 
narrow changes in policy. They won't help victims such as Kathryn 
Johnston, an elderly Atlanta woman killed by police in a hail of 
gunfire a year ago. Under pressure to make drug arrests, they said, 
members of an Atlanta narcotics squad lied to a judge to obtain a "no 
knock" warrant for Johnston's house, where they believed they would 
find illegal substances. But the elderly woman, who lived behind 
barred windows, thought she was the victim of a robbery and fired on 
the officers. They returned fire. No drugs were found on her premises.

The nation's so-called war on drugs brings to mind Albert Einstein's 
famous definition of insanity: Doing the same thing over and over and 
expecting a different result.

Our war on drugs really is a war on people. That's true insanity.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake