Pubdate: Fri, 12 Oct 2007
Source: Toronto Star (CN ON)
Copyright: 2007 The New York Times Company
Contact:  http://www.thestar.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/456
Author: Thomas Fuller, New York Times
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/heroin.htm (Heroin)
Bookmark: http://drugnews.org/topics/poppy  (Poppy)

HOW GOLDEN TRIANGLE BECAME AN ALSO-RAN IN HEROIN TRADE

Today, The Lion's Share Of Opium Production Has Moved To The Poppy 
Fields Of Afghanistan

The enduring image of Southeast Asia's Golden Triangle is of brightly 
coloured poppy fields, opium-smoking hill tribes and heroin labs 
hidden in the jungle.

But the reality is that after years of producing the lion's share of 
the world's opium, the Golden Triangle is now only a bit player in 
the global heroin trade.

"The mystique may remain, and the geography will be celebrated in the 
future by novelists," says Antonio Maria Costa, executive director of 
the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. "But from our vantage 
point, we see a region that is rapidly moving toward an opium-free status."

The decline of the Golden Triangle is a major, if little noticed, 
milestone in the war on drugs. The question now is whether that 
success can be sustained.

Three decades ago, the northernmost reaches of Laos, Thailand and 
Burma, also known as Myanmar, produced more than 70 per cent of all 
the opium sold worldwide, most of which was refined into heroin. 
Today, the area produces about 5 per cent of the world total, says 
Costa's agency. What happened?

Economic pressure from China, crackdowns on opium farmers and a 
switch by criminal syndicates to methamphetamine production appear to 
have had the biggest impact. At the same time, some insurgent groups 
that once were financed with drug money now say they are urging 
farmers to eradicate their poppy fields.

As a result, the Golden Triangle has been eclipsed by the Golden 
Crescent - the poppy-growing area in and around Afghanistan that is 
now the source of an estimated 92 per cent of the world's opium, 
according to the United Nations.

Much of the growth in opium production there is in areas controlled 
by the Taliban, which United States officials say uses revenue from 
opium and heroin to finance itself.

This shift to Afghanistan has had major consequences for the global 
heroin market: a near doubling of opium production worldwide in less 
than two decades.

Poppies grown in the fertile valleys of southern Afghanistan yield on 
average four times more opium than those grown in upland Southeast Asia.

A striking aspect of the decline of the Golden Triangle is the role 
China has played in pressing opium-growing regions to eradicate poppy 
crops. A major market for Golden Triangle heroin, China has seen a 
spike in addicts and HIV infections from contaminated needles.

The area of Burma along the Chinese border, which once produced about 
30 per cent of the country's opium, was declared opium-free last year 
by the United Nations.

Local authorities, who are autonomous from Burma's central military 
government, have banned poppy cultivation and welcomed Chinese 
investment in rubber, sugar cane and tea plantations, casinos and 
other businesses.

"China has had an underestimated role," says Martin Jelsma, a Dutch 
researcher who has written on the illicit drug trade in Asia.

"Their main leverage is economic - these border areas of Burma are by 
now economically much more connected to China than the rest of Burma. 
For local authorities, it's quite clear that, for any investments 
they want to attract, co-operation with China is a necessity."

Burma remains the world's second-leading source of opium but is a 
distant second; its production fell by 80 per cent over the last decade.

Insurgents have long used opium to help finance civil wars in the 
Golden Triangle. But some are now working to destroy the crop.

At least one faction of the Shan State Army, a group that long had 
ties to the heroin business, says it is leading eradication efforts.

Kon Jern, a military commander for the group, which is based along 
Burma's b order with northern Thailand, is cracking down because 
government militias and corrupt officials profit from opium.

"They sell the drugs, they buy weapons, and they use those weapons to 
attack us," he says. The United Nations credits the Burmese military 
government with leading the eradication effort in Shan areas.

In Laos, where the political situation is more stable, the government 
began a crackdown in the 1990s to increase its international 
credibility and because officials realized their own children were at 
risk, says Leik Boonwaat, the representative in Laos for the UN's 
Office on Drugs and Crime. Laos finally outlawed opium in 1996.

He says the government also saw that opium did little to help poor 
farmers who grew poppies.

"It's mostly the organized crime syndicates that made most of the profits."

The amount of land cultivated in Laos for opium has fallen 94 per 
cent since 1998. The country produces so little opium that it may now 
be a net importer of the drug, the United Nations says.

Yet experts warn that the reductions may not hold unless farmers 
develop other ways to make a living.

Pierre-Arnaud Chouvy, an opium specialist at the National Centre for 
Scientific Research in Paris, says it took Thailand 30 years to wean 
opium farmers from poppy production, a transition led by the Thai 
royal family, which encouraged hill tribes to use their cooler 
climate to produce coffee, macadamia nuts and green vegetables.

Kon, the rebel commander in Burma, says farmers are finding it 
difficult to switch crops.

"If they change and grow other kinds of plants, nobody comes to buy 
their products - the transportation is not good," he explains.

Experts say that to stay free of opium, isolated villages that 
depended on it will need assistance and investment for better roads, 
schools and clinics.

But Burma, with its ruling junta, poses a dilemma for Western countries.

The United States has an embargo on trade with the country, and the 
European Union has suspended trade privileges and defence 
co-operation, limiting its aid to humanitarian assistance.

"This policy of boycott and isolation has, of course, meant that only 
very little development aid and humanitarian assistance is flowing 
into the country," says Jelsma, the Dutch expert on drugs. "That 
makes the chances of the sustainability of this decline very questionable."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom