Pubdate: Wed, 19 Sep 2007
Source: StarPhoenix, The (CN SN)
Copyright: 2007 The StarPhoenix
Contact: http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/letters.html
Website: http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/400
Author: Jack Aubry, CanWest News Service
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?216 (CN Police)

CANADIANS CONDONE POLICE LAWBREAKING: POLL

OTTAWA -- Canadians want a crackdown on organized crime and
overwhelmingly support officers breaking the law to infiltrate gangs,
a new federal government poll indicates.

The national survey, conducted for the Department of Public Safety,
also reveals that a majority of Canadians believe organized crime is
"as serious" a threat to Canada as terrorism, with seven of 10 wanting
improvements in the federal government's current level of effort to
combat it.

A remarkable 48 per cent of Canadians responded that organized crime
had an impact on them personally and identified drug trafficking as
the crime with the highest level of correlation to the criminal
activity. And more than half (54 per cent) agree that members of
motorcycle gangs should be prosecuted based on participation alone,
regardless of whether they have committed a crime.

"The majority of respondents believe that undercover police officers
should be permitted to commit certain crimes in order to infiltrate
gangs -- 40 per cent strongly agree and 35 per cent somewhat agree,"
said the survey's executive summary.

But Alan Borovoy, the general counsel for the Canadian Civil Liberties
Association, wondered if the Conservative government was in the
process of preparing legislation giving police greater powers and was
using the survey to create the need for new laws.

He warned that the issue is not as black and white as presented by the
survey and that police already have sweeping powers to battle crime.

He said the association's position on the issue is nuanced, and it
acknowledges that there are "extreme" situations in which the case can
be made to allow police to break the law.

"In the past, they've argued for these powers at a time when you were
reading in the newspapers about police conducting busts here and busts
there, and busting up that ring and this ring, and you start to
wonder, if they are doing so well with all these powers, where is the
argument for anything new," said Borovoy.

"So they may want to legislate and they have a survey now that demands
that they legislate. This is a marvellous way to run a country."

The executive summary put out by Public Safety Canada with the poll
said it was conducted to "examine public perceptions of the prevalence
of organized crime, the perceived risk of victimization and how
Canadians view efforts to combat organized crime in Canada." Conducted
between March 15 and 29, involving 1,337 telephone interviews with
adults aged 18 and over, the poll has a margin of error of plus or
minus 2.7 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. It cost taxpayers
$47,650.

The RCMP, which is required by law to disclose annually their
lawbreaking activities, authorized undercover agents to break the law
with immunity from criminal charges 11 times in 2005-06, during
investigations into drug trafficking, counterfeiting, alleged
corruption of public officials and tobacco smuggling. The number of
cases was up from seven in 2004-05 and six in 2003-04. All of the
reported cases last year were carried out by civilian agents of the
police, who are typically undercover informants, rather than the
police themselves.

The "law enforcement justification provisions" for officers were
enacted in 2002 following a Supreme Court of Canada ruling that said
police did not have carte blanche to break the law in the line of duty.

The poll found that 84 per cent of Canadians view organized crime as a
serious issue in Canada, with the two highest responses of "very
concerned" being linked to child pornography on the Internet (79 per
cent) and identity theft (75 per cent). The three measures most
favoured by Canadians to combat organized crime include mandatory
first degree murder for killing a justice official, like a prosecutor
or juror; longer sentences and reduced eligibility for parole for
offences linked to organized crime; and new measures to improve the
safety of witnesses and jurors, such as shielding their identities.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake