Pubdate: Mon, 03 Sep 2007
Source: Washington Times (DC)
Copyright: 2007 News World Communications, Inc.
Contact:  http://www.washingtontimes.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/492
Author: Valerie Richardson, Washington Times
Cited: Denver City Council http://www.denvergov.org/CityCouncil
Cited: Citizens for a Safer Denver http://saferdenver.saferchoice.org/
Cited: I-75: Seattle, Washington http://www.drugsense.org/caip#wa_75
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Safer+Denver
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Marijuana)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)

POT TOUTED TO CALM DENVER RALLIES

DENVER -- Activists here are moving to liberalize the city's 
marijuana-possession laws in time for next year's Democratic National 
Convention.

The Denver City Council voted 13-0 last week to place a measure on 
the Nov. 6 ballot that would make prosecuting adults with an ounce or 
less of marijuana "the city's lowest law-enforcement priority."

Not that the council had much choice. Activists with Citizens for a 
Safer Denver gathered almost 6,000 signatures to back the proposal, 
forcing the council to place it on the ballot or approve an identical 
ordinance.

Mason Tvert, the group's executive director, said the petition was 
undertaken with an eye to the Democrats' Aug. 24-28 convention. 
Encouraging the anticipated throng of protesters to choose marijuana 
over alcohol would ensure a calmer atmosphere, he said. Groups such 
as the Recreate 68 Alliance, named after the 1968 Democratic Party 
convention in Chicago known for clashes between protesters and 
police, plan massive demonstrations and civil disobedience.

"Tens of thousands of people are going to come here to protest and 
rally," Mr. Tvert said. "If we allow alcohol use to be at the center, 
we're asking for trouble. But if we allow protesters to use 
marijuana, then maybe they'll be less inclined to use alcohol and 
cause problems."

Before the vote, Mr. Tvert offered to make a deal with the council: 
The group would withdraw the petition if the mayor and council agreed 
to place a moratorium on adult marijuana arrests during the 
Democratic convention.

"Visitors and city residents should not face the threat of arrest for 
simply making the rational, safer choice to use marijuana instead of 
alcohol, if that is what they prefer," Mr. Tvert said.

It was an offer city officials could refuse, and did. What's more, 
the council excoriated Citizens for a Safer Denver for abusing the 
trust of voters who signed the petition.

"At that point I ... said, 'What kind of game is this where an 
organization thinks they can negotiate with the will of the voters?' 
" council member Judy Montero said. "I was appalled."

Rachel Gordon, spokeswoman for the Denver 2008 Convention Host 
Committee, declined to comment on the issue.

Denver already boasts the most liberal marijuana law in the nation. 
Two years ago, voters approved a ballot initiative making it legal 
for adults to possess an ounce or less of marijuana. But that 
ordinance was superseded by state law, which bans marijuana 
possession of any kind.

Council member Carol Boigon said any real effort to reform the city's 
drug laws would have to go through the state legislature. "If you're 
serious, go to the state," she said.

A dozen U.S. cities, including Santa Barbara and San Francisco, have 
enacted laws placing adult possession of small amounts of marijuana 
at the bottom of their law-enforcement priorities. In Seattle, city 
officials reported that there was "no evidence of adverse effect" 
from the ordinance.

"Seattle is proud to serve as an example of a city that has 
established a more sensible marijuana policy that is safe, effective, 
and inexpensive," two Seattle City Council members, Nick Licata and 
Tom Rasmussen, said in a letter to the Denver council.

Their assurances failed to sway Denver council members, almost all of 
whom declared their intention to oppose the measure in November.

"I want people to understand that there were some real shenanigans 
with this initiative," council President Michael Hancock said. 
"There's no way I would vote yes on this, and I'll do everything I 
can to let the public know." 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake