Pubdate: Thu, 01 Jun 2006
Source: Plain Dealer, The (Cleveland, OH)
Copyright: 2006 The Plain Dealer
Contact:  http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/342
Note: priority given to local letter writers
Author: Karen Farkas
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis)

SHERIFF BLAMES SLOPPY WORK IN BOTCHED CAMPUS DRUG CASE

Akron -- The Summit County Drug Unit will be more closely supervised 
and work under tightened procedures, Sheriff Drew Alexander said 
Wednesday, after an investigation of a 2004 undercover operation at 
the University of Akron.

The office reviewed the case of Charles Plinton, 25, a graduate 
student who was arrested and charged with selling marijuana. A jury 
acquitted him in August 2004. Plinton was suspended from school for a 
semester but never returned. He committed suicide last December.

Alexander said the unit did not follow departmental policies. He said 
Plinton's case showed that every investigation is important, whether 
it involves a minor marijuana sale or a major operation.

"Bottom line, we did sloppy police work," he said. "There is nothing 
I can do to go back and fix that case, but I can make sure it never 
happens again."

Alexander said he still believes enough probable cause existed to 
indict Plinton, who had an alibi for the times he was accused of 
selling marijuana.

"The way it was presented at trial, it was sloppy, and I don't blame 
any jury for finding him not guilty," Alexander said. "The system worked."

A University of Akron police officer, who was also a member of the 
drug unit, suggested doing a drug investigation on campus, according 
to the report, prepared by Sheriff's Inspector Keith Thornton. More 
than 200 campus complaints had been received between January 2001 and 
February 2004.

After attempts by undercover officers and off-campus informants were 
unsuccessful, an undercover drug informant - who had made buys for 
the drug unit since October 2003 - was placed in a dorm room in 
February 2004, the report said. The university police officer supervised him.

The informant, wearing a transmitter, paid a total of $90 to buy 
marijuana from a man named Mark on March 3 and 11. The officer 
witnessed the purchases. But neither was able to identify Mark from 
photos of men who had been arrested before. The informant later 
provided a video from a nearby dormitory, and the men agreed that 
Mark was Plinton.

A University of Akron sergeant, who said Plinton told him after he 
was arrested on April 24 that he was selling marijuana for a friend, 
did not type up or submit his report until July 28, a week before 
Plinton's trial.

The sheriff's report released Wednesday says that reports on the drug 
buys and the attempts to identify Mark lacked detail and credibility. 
The quality of the recordings was poor.

As part of the reforms, all drug cases will be reviewed regularly by 
supervisors. The Sheriff's Office will buy better digital recording 
devices, and everyone involved in an undercover operation will fill 
out reports.

"Rules and regulations are your Bible in police work," Alexander 
said. "We can't take shortcuts."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman