Pubdate: Thu, 09 Jun 2005
Source: Metrowest Daily News (MA)
Copyright: 2005 MetroWest Daily News
Contact:  http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/619
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Raich (Gonzales v. Raich )

MARIJUANA AND CONGRESS

According to John Walters, director of this nation's Drug Control
Policy, there is no scientific proof that marijuana is a safe or
effective drug suitable for medical purposes.

That just isn't true.

As the  Supreme Court noted in an opinion this week, many studies
clearly show that  marijuana -- even in its crude form -- controls
severe pain in people with  chronic disease, calms nausea and
stimulates appetite in cancer patients as they  undergo debilitating
chemotherapy and radiation therapies, and eases the anxiety  in
patients told there is nothing the medical profession can do to save
their  lives.

The data,  gathered over a period of many years in controlled tests
and by talking to and  examining countless patients who have been
using medicinal marijuana, is  conclusive. It is a safe and suitable
alternative to other far more addictive  drugs -- such as cocaine and
morphine -- both of which -- unlike marijuana --  can be legally
prescribed in all 50 states. Marijuana  is defined by federal law as a
drug having a high potential for abuse and with  no currently accepted
medical use. In 11 states, proponents of medical marijuana  have
fought successfully to change that definition. Yet a 6 to  3 Supreme
Court decision this week says federal law trumps state law; federal
law does not permit growing, selling or using marijuana under any
circumstances.  Patients using physician-prescribed marijuana in the
11 states in which it is  legal can be arrested and prosecuted under
the federal Controlled Substances Act  just as easily as back alley
joint-smoking teens. Justice  John Paul Stevens says their decision is
meant to curtail "unscrupulous  physicians" who would oversubscribe
the drug for profit -- illogical reasoning  when one considers the
other legal drugs from which "unscrupulous physicians"  can profit.

As damning  as it seems to suffering patients who depend on marijuana
for relief, however,  Stevens has some sound advice.

The reclassification of marijuana is better  sought at the federal
level through Congress, and Rep. Barney Frank (D-4th)  hopes to be
that conduit.

For the  10th straight year, he has filed legislation that would allow
doctors to  prescribe marijuana just as they prescribe other drugs.

He says the legislation  doesn't have enough support for a hearing,
let along passage this year, but  there are signs that will change.
"We're getting there," he said. In the  meantime, the House of
Representatives considers an appropriations amendment  this week that
prohibits the Justice Department from using money to enforce  federal
drug laws against patients using physician-prescribed marijuana. The
Supreme  Court's decision, while defensible on constitutional grounds,
is a setback for  those whose suffering could be relieved by medical
marijuana. But the courts  aren't the place to win their battle.

Polls show up to 75 percent of Americans  support legalizing medical
marijuana.

It's time Congress heard from  them.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake