Pubdate: Wed, 08 Jun 2005
Source: Naples Daily News (FL)
Copyright: 2005 Naples Daily News.
Contact:  http://www.naplesnews.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/284
Note: Publisher prints several newspapers - please indicate which newspaper 
in LTEs.
Author: Paul Campos
Note: Paul Campos is a law professor at the University of Colorado.
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Raich (Raich v. Ashcroft)

IN THE GRIP OF REEFER MADNESS

When it comes to marijuana, the life of the law has been neither logic nor 
experience, but rather sheer unadulterated craziness.

The life of the law, Oliver Wendell Holmes famously remarked, has not been 
logic but experience.

When it comes to marijuana, the life of the law has been neither logic nor 
experience, but rather sheer unadulterated craziness. Another chapter in 
that disgraceful history was written this week, when the Supreme Court 
refused to overturn a federal law ordering the national government to 
ignore state laws that allow doctors to prescribe marijuana for their patients.

The six justices who voted to uphold the law did so on the basis of this 
argument: Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce. If states 
make it legal for individuals or organizations to cultivate marijuana for 
medicinal purposes, some of the drug may end up on the black market. Once 
it's in the stream of commerce, there's no way to ensure that it won't 
cross state lines. Hence the federal government has the authority to 
enforce federal laws that make growing a single marijuana plant in one's 
own house, for personal medical use under the supervision of a doctor, a 
federal crime.

This ruling comes from the same court that decided not too long ago that 
the federal government doesn't have the power to make it a crime to possess 
a handgun in a school zone, because such a law doesn't affect interstate 
commerce.

Of course another distinction between these two cases is that no one was 
hurt by a handgun in the United States last year, while marijuana kills 
410,000 people annually. (Following precedents established recently by 
Centers for Disease Control Director Julie Gerberding, I'm simply 
fabricating whatever statistics will support insane public policies.)

Nothing captures the extent to which we are still in the grip of reefer 
madness than this sentence from Justice Scalia's concurrence: "Congress has 
undertaken to extinguish the interstate market in Schedule I controlled 
substances, including marijuana. The Commerce Clause unquestionably permits 
this."

Sometimes it's important to step back from ordinary-sounding statements, so 
as to appreciate how flat-out crazy they really are.

First, consider what a gigantic edifice of lies must be maintained for 
government officials to continue to classify marijuana as a Schedule I 
drug. A Schedule I drug must have a high potential for abuse, no recognized 
medical use, and no safe use under medical supervision.

Marijuana does not have a high potential for abuse in comparison to 
substances such as alcohol and tobacco, it has a number of recognized 
medical uses, and it's almost perfectly safe when used under medical 
supervision. These are not opinions: they are facts.

These facts are worth repeating, because it's always worth pointing out 
that the federal government is telling lies to the public, and that 
politicians who traffic in these lies should be called to account for doing so.

Second, let us ponder for a moment the Alice in Wonderland universe in 
which "Congress has undertaken to extinguish the interstate market in 
marijuana." Despite ferocious government repression, millions of Americans 
continue to use marijuana on a regular basis. The only risks such use poses 
for the vast majority of these people are the risks inherent in breaking 
laws -- stupid and immoral laws that will continue to be treated with the 
contempt they deserve.

Even if marijuana was dangerous enough to justify criminalizing its 
uncontrolled use, it would still be preposterous to ban its use as a 
medical treatment, in a nation where endless assortments of far more 
dangerous drugs are prescribed by the millions every day.

In the long run, nothing undercuts respect for legal authority more than 
the kind of moral cowardice that allows laws of this sort to be enacted and 
enforced.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager