Pubdate: Tue, 05 Jul 2005
Source: Herald Sun (Australia)
Copyright: 2005 Herald and Weekly Times
Contact:  http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/187
Author: Cindy Wockner
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Schapelle (Schapelle Corby)

CORBY SHOCK AS TRIAL IS REOPENED

SCHAPELLE Corby's drug smuggling trial will be reopened so new 
witnesses from Australia can be called.

Yesterday's shock decision by the Denpasar High Court paves the way 
for her lawyers to call the 12 witnesses they say could win her freedom.

It was greeted by whoops of joy and cries of "thank God" from her 
lawyers and family.

Corby's sister, Mercedes, was ecstatic.

"She is going to be relieved. It is really great news," she said.

Rosleigh Rose, Corby's mother, said she was "over the moon".

"It's fantastic news and it's one step closer to bringing Schapelle 
home," she said.

Ms Rose called on the Federal Government to "pull their finger out" 
and help arrange witnesses -- including the alleged owner of the 
4.1kg of marijuana Corby says was planted in her bodyboard bag last October.

"The Government can't pussyfoot around . . . they have to give the 
lawyers the witnesses they need," she said.

Corby's sacked-then-reinstated lawyer Erwin Siregar said the decision 
was a surprise, but it was now incumbent on the Indonesian and 
Australian governments to co-operate to get the witnesses to Bali.

A spokeswoman for Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said Australia had 
received no formal request from Indonesia.

She said if Australian prisoners were asked to give evidence the 
Government could help, but the inmates would have to agree, and "any 
request would need to come from the Indonesian Government".

The court's Chief Judge, Gusti Made Lingga, said that while the 
evidence at the trial appeared sufficient, the defence had presented 
"relevant" reasons for the case to be reopened, based on the doubts 
raised that someone could have planted the drugs in Corby's bag at 
either Sydney or Brisbane airports.

He said Corby could be acquitted or her sentence slashed.

But sceptical prosecutor I.B. Wiswantanu said the only witness who 
could help Corby was a person convicted of putting the drugs in her bag.

The hearing is not a complete retrial -- it will consider only new 
witnesses' evidence.

It will be heard by the same panel of three judges who convicted 
Corby and sentenced her to 20 years' jail.

But they will not decide guilt or innocence this time. That will be 
done by three High Court judges, based on a report of the proceedings.

The High Court has indicated that it wants the reopened case to begin 
as soon as possible, but it could be up to a month before it is organised.

The defence had asked that 12 witnesses be called, including former 
Victorian prisoner Ronnie Vigenser, whom the court heard was the 
owner of the 4.1kg of marijuana found in Corby's bag.

Mr Vigenser has already denied the claims.

Another prisoner, John Patrick Ford, was brought from Australia for 
the trial to tell of overhearing a jail conversation in which two 
prisoners named Mr Vigenser as the drug's owner.

The defence also wants those two prisoners -- known only as Paul and 
Terry -- brought to Bali.

At least one is believed to be still in a Melbourne jail and has said 
he is not involved in the case.

The list also includes Qantas and Australian Airlines check-in and 
CCTV officials, baggage-handling officials from Sydney and Brisbane 
airports, and the Customs chief at Brisbane airport.

Mr Vigenser said he was happy to tell his story in Bali, as long as 
his travel expenses were paid.

"Why not? F-----g oath. I'll go for a holiday and tell them what I 
know -- which is nothing. Not a problem," he said.

Mr Ford's wife, Rita, said he was also prepared to return to Bali.

He is on remand on charges of raping, stalking and threatening to 
kill his ex-girlfriend.

Corby's former Australian lawyer, Robin Tampoe, who quit after 
accusing her family of greed and disloyalty, said the retrial was good news.

He said an acquittal would be difficult, but a substantial cut in 
sentence was possible if the right evidence, including the alleged 
role of airport baggage handlers in drug running, was presented. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake