Pubdate: Thu, 13 Jan 2005
Source: Baltimore Sun (MD)
Copyright: 2005 The Baltimore Sun, a Times Mirror Newspaper.
Contact:  http://www.baltimoresun.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/37
Author: Clarence Page

NO PAYOLA PUNDITS

WASHINGTON -- My conservative pundit friend Armstrong Williams just had the 
weekend from hell, answering phones and juggling interviews like a 
multitasking press agent for Paris Hilton.

"Have you seen the coverage?" he exclaimed over the phone. "I had no idea I 
was this important!"

Well, sorry, my friend, but it's not just about you. There's also the 
matter of $240,000 in taxpayer money.

That's how much the Education Department paid Mr. Williams to promote the 
Bush administration's No Child Left Behind education reform policy in his 
dual roles as chief executive officer of a public relations firm and a 
multimedia news and public affairs pundit.

An enterprising USA Today reporter last week unearthed the deal that the 
Ketchum public relations firm signed with Mr. Williams' Washington-based PR 
firm, Graham Williams, in late 2003 on behalf of the Education Department. 
It required Mr. Williams to promote the No Child Left Behind legislation on 
his nationally syndicated TV show and to urge America's Black Forum, a 
syndicated public affairs television program on which he and I have 
appeared, to "periodically address" the law. The contract also required Mr. 
Williams to interview Education Secretary Rod Paige for TV and radio spots 
that aired during the show in 2004 and allow Mr. Paige to appear as an 
interview guest in a Williams-produced TV show.

"I wanted to do it because it's something I believe in," Mr. Williams said. 
Unfortunately, payola is wrong, even when you're being paid to do something 
you would have done for free anyway.

Mr. Williams probably understood this when he conveniently failed to tell 
his audiences or hardly anyone else at his many jobs and public appearances 
about his cozy contract. When it became a front-page story, he shifted into 
full PR mode. He confessed to bad judgment, apologized to his audiences and 
promised never, ever to conflict his interests again. But he refused to 
return the money his firm was paid.

Tribune Media Services, which distributed his column (and distributes mine) 
nationally, dropped him. No problem, he said. He plans to syndicate himself 
and keep all of the money this time. That's Mr. Williams. Always the 
entrepreneur.

Of course, that's where his conflicts began. He's not a journalist, but he 
likes to play as if he's one. My enterprising friend is something quite 
different from conventional journalists, pundits or public relations 
agents. Like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Al Franken, Michael Moore or Tavis 
Smiley, he is an amalgam of all three -- with some P. T. Barnum thrown in. 
He is larger than journalism. He is, in short, a brand. Brands don't need 
to cover stories. They are the story.

As a passionately outspoken aide to Sen. Strom Thurmond and an adviser to 
Clarence Thomas when the U.S. Supreme Court justice was head of the Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission, Mr. Williams built his brand as a black 
conservative at a time when a new pundit industry was blossoming.

With cable TV, talk radio and other new media taking off, you no longer had 
to have a lot to say in order to get air time. You merely had to be 
available at the flip of a producer's Rolodex to give good sound bites from 
the left or the right, depending on which slot needed to be filled.

As filmmaker Woody Allen once said, 80 percent of success is showing up. So 
is broadcast punditry.

Now that the media are holding him up to the ethics standards of 
conventional journalists, Mr. Williams said, in what sounded like full spin 
mode, that he will change his ways. "I'm not going to advocate for anybody 
or any of the issues that I talk about on television," he vowed. "Either 
you're going to be a journalist or out hustling for money. I want to be a 
journalist."

Thanks, Mr. Williams, but I'll believe that when you give up your public 
relations business.

Adding insult to injury is the recent conclusion by the Government 
Accountability Office that the White House Office of National Drug Control 
Policy and the Department of Health and Human Services probably violated 
federal propaganda laws when the agencies distributed fake "news" videos 
designed to look like regular news reports for airing on local TV stations. 
It's estimated that 22 million viewers saw these "prepackaged news stories" 
without any indication of their government funding or that they were 
prepared by the ONDCP.

With the Armstrong Williams affair, Education Department spokesmen are 
vowing to cooperate with a looming congressional probe of the charade. 
Good. Secretary Paige is on his way out. Next to go out the door should be 
anyone who thinks fake news is a clever way to educate the public.

Clarence Page is a columnist for the Chicago Tribune, a Tribune Publishing 
newspaper. His column appears Thursdays in The Sun.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth