Pubdate: Wed, 02 Nov 2005
Source: Decatur Daily (AL)
Copyright: 2005 The Decatur Daily
Contact:  http://www.decaturdaily.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/696

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS AN INVESTMENT IN FUTURE

Alabama does not have a prison problem. It has a crime problem.

Rather than building more and bigger prisons -- or spending money to 
study the state's prison-crowding situation one more time -- Alabama 
should revamp its sentencing guidelines to get non-violent offenders 
treatment and rehabilitation.

A report released Monday points out that drug-related offenses made 
up 31 percent of state prison admissions in 2004 -- nearly twice the 
number of robbery, murder, rape and manslaughter entries combined, 
according to figures supplied by the Alabama Sentencing Commission.

Between 1999 and 2004, prison admissions for drug and alcohol 
offenses increased by 21 percent, while admissions for crimes against 
persons fell 14 percent.

Alabama lawmakers will consider a series of sentencing reform bills 
when the 2006 regular session convenes.

Gov. Bob Riley's task force on prison overcrowding has recommended 
reducing the prison population by alternative means of punishment, 
including transition centers, community corrections and 
drug-treatment programs.

Lawmakers would be wise to heed those recommendations.

We certainly don't advocate the legalization of marijuana, as 
announced gubernatorial candidate Loretta Nall has proposed. But 
community drug-treatment and rehabilitation programs make more sense 
than assigning pot possessors to prison beds.

Drug-treatment programs are expensive. But incarceration costs more 
in the long run.

Nor do community corrections programs work 100 percent of the time. 
Some who complete rehabilitation programs eventually return to 
illegal drug use. Often, addicts return to treatment several times 
before successfully kicking their habits.

Rehabilitation must be a goal of any criminal justice program. 
Locking up non-violent drug offenders together and with other 
criminals has proven ineffective in reducing recidivism.

Why change? The most compelling reason is that what the state has 
done historically hasn't worked. Our prisons keep overflowing.