Pubdate: Sun, 04 Jul 2004
Source: Mobile Register (AL)
Copyright: 2004 Mobile Register
Contact:  http://www.al.com/mobileregister/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/269
Author: Monique Curet, Staff Reporter
Cited: Marijuana Policy Project http://www.mpp.org
Cited: Drug Policy Alliance http://www.drugpolicy.org
Cited: Alabama District Attorney's Association http://www.adaa-ops.org/
Cited: Alabama Board of Medical Examiners http://www.albme.org/
Cited: Partnership for a Drug-Free Mobile 
http://www.cityofmobile.org/html/drugfree/index.php
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)

POLL MAJORITY SUPPORTS MEDICAL MARIJUANA USE

More than three-quarters of Alabamians think doctors should be allowed
to prescribe marijuana for medical purposes, though an even larger
percentage oppose outright legalization of the drug, the results of a
new Mobile Register-University of South Alabama poll suggest.

In last week's statewide survey of 417 people, the majority also
expressed indifference about political candidates' stances on medical
marijuana, and more than 70 percent said it would not influence their
vote if a candidate admitted using marijuana when he or she was young.

The poll, conducted Monday through Thursday, has a 5-percentage-point
margin of error.

The survey results come in the wake of a decision by the U.S. Supreme
Court last week to review the question of whether the federal
government can prosecute patients who are using marijuana under a
doctor's direction.

Nine states -- Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine,
Nevada, Oregon and Washington -- have laws that allow the medical use
of marijuana if a doctor recommends it. A majority of those polled
last week thought that states, not the federal government, should take
the lead in passing laws regarding the medical use of marijuana.

The issue of legalization also has surfaced in Alabama's U.S. Senate
race.

Wayne Sowell, a Birmingham Democrat who is challenging three-term U.S.
Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Tuscaloosa, said he supports the legalization
of medical marijuana and of hemp (a non-narcotic relative of marijuana
grown for its fiber) as a cash crop.

"Senator Shelby opposes the legalization of marijuana for any reason,"
said his spokeswoman, Virginia Davis.

Sowell said last week that he thinks the actual number of Alabamians
who support the legalization of marijuana for medical purposes may be
even higher than the poll indicates, but some people may be hesitant
to express that view because of the stigma attached to the drug.

Bruce Mirken, communications director for the Marijuana Policy
Project, said that Alabamians' support for medicinal marijuana is in
line with polling in other places, which, he said, consistently shows
support in the 70 percent to 80 percent range.

Mirken's organization, based in Washington, D.C., focuses on removing
criminal penalties for using the drug, "with a particular emphasis on
making marijuana medically available to seriously ill people who have
the approval of their doctors," according to its Web site.

The medical use issue is one that "clearly the public is most ready to
engage in," Mirken said.

Randy Hillman, executive director of the Alabama District Attorney's
Association, said he thinks prosecutors would not view the question of
medicinal use of marijuana from a moral perspective but from a
resources perspective.

Dealing with drug-related issues is "an enormous problem for us,"
Hillman said, adding that if marijuana was legalized in any form,
"you're about to add another layer onto that."

Hillman said some may argue that legalizing some uses of marijuana
would eliminate the issue for law enforcement. But if it's legalized,
he said, "you can't just turn it loose."

Authorities would have to ensure the legal forms of marijuana are
being used properly, he said, because it has the potential for getting
into the wrong hands, as with any controlled substance.

Federal law allows certain people, including physicians and
researchers, to dispense or administer so-called schedule I drugs,
which include experimental drugs and drugs not available to normal
practicing physicians, according to officials with the Alabama Board
of Medical Examiners.

Marijuana is included in that provision but has not been used by
Alabama physicians in about 15 years, said Larry Dixon, executive
director of state Board of Medical Examiners.

He said the marijuana used for medical purposes had to be provided by
the federal government, which stopped doing so. The only place in
Alabama that marijuana could be used for medicinal purposes at this
time is at research institutions, Dixon said.

The American Medical Association adopted a policy on medicinal
marijuana in 2001, which called for "further adequate and
well-controlled studies of marijuana" in patients with serious
conditions. The policy also recommended that marijuana continue to be
classified as a schedule I drug, pending the outcome of the studies.

George Krietemeyer, director of the Partnership for a Drug-Free
Mobile, said he was surprised that so many Alabamians approved of the
medical use of marijuana, because "I thought Alabama was more
conservative than that."

Krietemeyer said his organization is opposed to the medical use of
marijuana, because there are hundreds of other medications doctors can
prescribe that have been used successfully to treat seriously ill patients.

A drug called Marinol, for example, is a synthetic form of the major
active ingredient in marijuana (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, commonly
called THC) and has been approved by the federal Food and Drug
Administration for treating certain chemotherapy and AIDS-related symptoms.

Mirken, with the Marijuana Policy Project, argues that not every drug
works for every person. He said research shows that the medicinal
effects of marijuana don't all come from THC. Further, Mirken said,
marijuana is commonly used to combat nausea, so keeping a pill down
can be a problem.

An overwhelming majority of Alabamians polled last week said they
would oppose the total legalization of marijuana. But marijuana
advocates maintained that the wording of the query can influence the
answers received.

"Legalization is almost a buzzword that scares people," Mirken said.
He added that when that particular phrasing is used, people tend to
envision marijuana being sold on convenience store shelves, alongside
items such as candy bars.

Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance,
agreed. The alliance describes itself as "the leading organization
working to broaden the public debate on drug policy and to promote
realistic alternatives to the war on drugs."

Nadelmann said if the question was phrased differently -- so that
those polled were asked whether they support treating marijuana like
alcohol by regulating and taxing it -- he believes 25 percent of
Alabamians would respond favorably, compared to the 13 percent who
said they favored legalization.

Keith Nicholls, director of the USA Polling Group, which conducted the
poll, said he wouldn't dispute that if a different question was asked,
a different answer would be received. But, he pointed out, the issue
is not an obscure one, and the results reflect people's reaction to
the idea of legalization.

A majority of those polled said that a fine would be the most
appropriate punishment for people convicted of possessing small
amounts of marijuana.

Nadelmann called that "the definition of decriminalization."

Krietemeyer said the Partnership for a Drug-Free Mobile does not think
jail time is appropriate for first-time, small possession offenders.
He said serving time does necessarily result in people getting the
help they need, and treatment is an option that is not used frequently
enough. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake