Pubdate: Fri, 02 Jul 2004
Source: News-Press (FL)
Copyright: 2004 The News-Press
Contact:  http://www.news-press.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1133
Author: Jabari Asim, Washington Post Writer's Group

LOOKING AHEAD: HARVARD CRIMSON OR PRISON ORANGE

'Tough On Crime' Attitude Puts Mostly Minorities In Prison, With Sentences 
Too Harsh And Too Long

OUR VIEW: With high national incarceration rates getting much of the credit 
for the yearly decreases in crime, the Kennedy Justice Commission is going 
to have a fight to change grassroots "tough on crime" attitudes. But we're 
willing to talk about it.

How do you beat the odds?

That is a question you often ponder when you're the father of an 
African-American son. Even when you'd rather devote your mental energy 
toward other pressing considerations, it returns, a nagging doubt. The 
question can insert itself at the most inopportune moments, as it did last 
week while I played with my mischievous youngster.

Like dads of any ethnic background, I imagine a bright future for my child, 
rich with accomplishments and acclaim. Nothing too ambitious, understand. 
One Nobel Prize is plenty, thank you, and an Olympic bronze medal would 
please me just as much as a gold one. While we played, however, images of 
handcuffs and orange jumpsuits interrupted my visions of trophies and 
honorary doctorates. You see, my son was born in 2001. A new report by the 
American Bar Association states an African- American boy born that year has 
a 1-in-3 chance of being incarcerated in his lifetime.

You don't have to have a 3-year-old son to be distressed. You don't have to 
have four sons, as I do, to be reminded daily that in some cities more than 
half the young African-American men are under the supervision of the 
criminal justice system. You don't have to be black or male to believe 
something is deeply disturbing about such percentages. You don't even have 
to be a liberal.

The costs of prison

When it comes to incarceration, "our resources are misspent, our 
punishments too severe, our sentences too long," U.S. Supreme Court Justice 
Anthony Kennedy told the American Bar Association in April 2003. In an 
extraordinary speech, he went on to lament both the economic and human 
costs of keeping more than 2 million Americans behind bars. It was time, he 
suggested, for the ABA to "help start a new public discussion about the 
prison system."

In October 2003, the ABA formed the 14-member Kennedy Justice Commission to 
do just that. Its findings, released recently, noted a sixfold increase in 
the federal and state prison populations between 1974 and 2002 -- from 
216,000 to 1,355,748. The economic costs have been huge.

Between 1982 and 1999, direct expenditures on corrections by federal, state 
and local governments increased from $9 billion to $49 billion.

The human costs have also been astronomical, and disproportionately harmful 
to racial minorities. This imbalance derives mostly from mandatory minimum 
sentences for drug crimes, "the largest driver of expanding prison 
populations" the ABA commission said. In 1999, for example, 
African-Americans constituted 13 percent of drug users, the ABA study 
indicated. That same year, they constituted 35 percent of drug arrests, 53 
percent of drug convictions and 58 percent of those in prison for drug 
offenses. "Mandatory minimum sentences," said commission chair Stephen 
Saltzburg, "tend to be tough on the wrong people."

Change of direction?

The commission recommends repealing the minimums, eliminating ethnic and 
racial profiling as official policies and putting more money into drug 
treatment efforts.

In addition to addressing disparities in sentencing, the proposals take aim 
at our justice system's glaring failure to rehabilitate those whom it has 
chosen to punish. As evidence, the commission cites figures from the 
Criminal Justice Institute, which put the national recidivism rate in 2000 
at nearly 34 percent.

It's easy to dismiss our prisons' rapidly revolving doors as proof that 
some convicts are simply beyond repair, but Justice Kennedy cautions 
against such notions. He told the ABA: "To be sure, the prisoner has 
violated the social contract; to be sure, he must be punished to vindicate 
the law, to acknowledge the suffering of the victim and to deter future 
crimes. Still, the prisoner is a person; still, he or she is part of the 
family of humankind." To reinforce that integral connection, the commission 
advocates creating programs that will make it easier for released inmates 
to re-enter society.

The ABA will consider endorsing the commission's report at its August 
annual meeting. Meanwhile, those of us who strive to keep our African- 
American sons on the correct side of the law will continue to raise them 
with love and discipline, ever mindful of their responsibilities as 
citizens, ever aware of the fragility of their freedom. We may even 
entertain the hope that those who stubbornly cling to narrow notions of law 
and order will join Justice Kennedy in acknowledging that: the phrase 
`tough on crime' should not be a substitute for moral reflection."

We realize, of course, that those are tough odds too.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D