Pubdate: Sat, 17 Apr 2004
Source: St. Petersburg Times (FL)
Section: Pasco County
Copyright: 2004 St. Petersburg Times
Contact: http://connect.sptimes.com/contactus/letterstoeditor.html
Website: http://www.sptimes.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/419
Author: Richard Raeke, Times Staff Writer

DRUG CASE YIELDS SYMPATHY, SENTENCE

Richard Paey's Prison Term for Illegally Possessing Painkillers Makes 
Nobody Happy, Including a Juror.

NEW PORT RICHEY - Accused drug trafficker Richard Paey was sentenced Friday 
to spend the next 25 years in prison. Paey believes the sentence is unfair. 
So does the judge who sentenced him. And the prosecutors did what they 
could to avoid the harsh penalty.

Before trial, they offered him house arrest and probation for forging 
prescriptions to obtain painkillers. But Paey was stubborn. He didn't think 
he had done anything wrong. So he chose to stand on principle and go on 
trial. He knew the state needed a unanimous jury vote for conviction. Paey 
gambled that prosecutors could not convince all the jurors of his guilt.

And they didn't.

But the one juror who thought Paey was not guilty voted for conviction, a 
decision he now regrets.

"It's my fault," said juror Dwayne Hillis, a 42-year-old landscaper from 
Hudson. "Basically I should have stuck it out."

"They compromised," Paey said, "and in the field of justice, compromises 
lead to horrible injustice."

But compromise is at the heart of the daily business of criminal justice. 
More often than not, prosecutors allege one crime, then settle for a guilty 
plea to a lesser plea, just as they did with Paey, 45, of Hudson.

During trial weeks, judges set 40 cases on their calendar, knowing the 
sides will settle at the last minute. It's the grease that keeps the courts 
from being even more jammed than they already are.

Right or wrong, it was not Hillis' compromise that sealed Paey's fate. 
Prosecutors say it was Paey's unwillingness to compromise.

"It's unfortunate that anybody has to go to prison but he's got no one to 
blame but Richard Paey," Assistant State Attorney Mike Halkitis.

Paey doesn't believe he has done anything wrong. He suffers from chronic 
pain and he and his doctor took steps to relieve that pain.

He declined to make a statement before the court Friday. But his wife, 
Linda Paey, explained his unwillingness to take a plea bargain.

"My husband's stubbornness comes from the fact that he does not feel he is 
guilty," she said.

* * *

Paey needed to be charged, just like others who forge prescriptions for 
painkillers, Halkitis said. "Even if he possessed one pill illegally, it's 
a crime."

"All we wanted to do was get him help and get him treated to ensure that 
he's not doing anything criminal," he added.

Paey was severely injured in a 1985 car accident. Flawed back surgery 
following that crash has left him in a wheelchair. His injuries also left 
him needing large numbers of painkillers, he said.

Between January and March of 1997, Paey bought 1,200 pills from a number of 
pharmacies. Investigators from the Pasco County Sheriff's Office and the 
federal Drug Enforcement Agency were watching him the whole time.

That investigation was the first problem with the case, Hillis said.

"Why didn't they just stop him after the first time?" he asked. "It seemed 
like a witch hunt."

"I kept waiting to hear that he was selling them somehow. If he was selling 
them, that's one thing. But he was eating them."

Hillis was the lone hold-out on the jury. He saw problems with the 
prosecution's case, beginning with its star witness, Dr. Steven Nurkiewicz. 
Nurkiewicz, who treated Paey in New Jersey, testified that he violated 
federal law by sending undated prescriptions to Paey after he moved to 
Florida. Yet no charges were brought against him.

The doctor also said he never wrote prescriptions for 400 pills a month. 
But Nurkiewicz's own logbooks contradicted that testimony.

And, Hillis said, there was no handwriting analysis to prove Paey had 
forged the signatures. A worker in Nurkiewicz's office could have signed them.

Paey bought Percocet, which contains 1.5 percent oxycodone as the active 
ingredient. Under the law, trafficking in more than 28 grams of oxycodone - 
less than a 100-pill prescription of Percocet - qualifies for the minimum 
mandatory sentence of 25 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.

"Someone needs to take a look at this case in Tallahassee and change (the 
law)," Attridge said.

"Well," said Circuit Judge Daniel Diskey. "You read my mind."

Attridge said a pill bottle of Percocet brings a 25-year sentence but 
10,000 pounds of marijuana results in a sentence of 15 years in prison and 
a $200,000 fine.

Against the judge's instructions, the jurors discussed the possibility of a 
25-year sentence for Paey, Hillis said. Many were uneasy with the 
punishment. But the jury foreman said Paey would get probation, Hillis added.

The jurors didn't know that the judge had no choice.

"In 22 years of practicing law . . . I have watched the trial court's 
discretion in sentencing eroding away." Diskey said Friday, adding that 
legislative guidelines have "virtually eliminated judicial discretion."

The judge said Paey had plenty of chances to settle the case, knowing the 
possibility of receiving a 25-year sentence.

"It should come as no surprise that I am going to follow the law," he added.

Assistant State Attorney Scott Andringa said there is more to the case than 
came out in court.

"This case is more aggravated than (Attridge) makes it out to be and than 
some people would be led to believe," he said. "It may not be so 
unreasonable as some would suggest."

In March, he approached Paey before attorneys picked a jury in his third trial.

"In court we said we would consider any reasonable offer made by Mr. Paey 
through his attorney," Andringa said.

After the jury convicted Paey of 15 counts of drug trafficking, obtaining a 
controlled substance by fraud and possession of a controlled substance, 
prosecutors offered him another deal - if he gave up his right to appeal 
the case. Paey said he wouldn't consider any deal that included time in prison.

But in the jury room on March 4, the verdict came down to a compromise. 
Deliberations had lasted close to 10 p.m. and everyone wanted to go home, 
Hillis said.

With assurances from the foreman that Paey would do no time in prison, 
Hillis compromised.

"I said, "Guilty. Put it on the (verdict). I hope you all can live with 
yourselves,' " Hillis recalled. "I just hate myself for what I did."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager