Pubdate: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 Source: New York Daily News (NY) Copyright: 2004 Daily News, L.P. Contact: http://www.nydailynews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/295 MAKING DRUG LAWS TOUGH BUT FAIR New York maintains its position as having the toughest anti-drug laws in the country even after the Legislature and Gov. Pataki agreed to reduce mandatory prison sentences for many offenses. Both parts of that equation are good. In finally softening the state's Rockefeller-era drug laws, Albany restored a sense of proportion to sentencing. No longer will narcotics offenders, including first-timers, be subject to mandatory terms that are longer than the terms for many violent crimes. Fifteen years to life for possession of relatively small amounts of drugs will be replaced by eight to 20 years for larger amounts. Make no mistake. That's still deserved hard time. The severest penalties were instituted in the 1970s by then-Gov. Nelson Rockefeller in the belief that purposefully harsh punishment would diminish drug use and halt its society-sapping side effects. Measured by the ever-flourishing narcotics trade, the law didn't meet that goal while also snaring some number of defendants who were far from hardened kingpins. Judges had no choice but to lock them away for as long as life, too. For more than a decade, those unlucky souls, often portrayed as errant grandmothers, fueled calls for softening the laws, but Pataki, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno fought to a stalemate over how the statute should be adjusted. Their sudden compromise speaks volumes about the three leaders' desire to be seen as getting something done in a Capitol that is widely scorned as gridlock central. They also may have taken note of David Soares' upset election as Albany district attorney after running a campaign that called for abolishing the Rockefeller laws. (Soares' views are explored on the facing page.) So be it. They reached common ground by jettisoning Pataki and Bruno's calls for getting even tougher on major drug players and the Assembly's preference for greater use of drug treatment and judicial discretion in sentencing. They stayed tough without being extreme and, showing mercy, they agreed to give more than 400 first-time offenders the right to petition for release. It was the right thing to do and should have happened a long time ago. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth