Pubdate: Fri, 05 Nov 2004
Source: Daily News Tribune (Waltham, MA)
Copyright: 2004 The Daily News Tribune
Contact:  http://www.dailynewstribune.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3562
Author: Michael Kunzelman, News Staff Writer
Cited: Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition http://www.MassCann.org
Cited: Drug Policy Forum of Massachusetts http://www.dpfma.org/
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/states/ma/ (Massachusetts)

VOTERS BACK POT FOR MEDICAL USE

BOSTON -- On Tuesday's ballot, MetroWest voters overwhelmingly approved a 
pair of non-binding initiatives that call for decriminalizing marijuana and 
legalizing the drug's use for medical purposes.

Another ballot question -- asking voters if they support granting equal 
custody rights to fathers and mothers is divorce cases -- also passed by 
wide margins in other parts of the region.

Statewide, voters in 12 different Senate and House of Representatives 
districts approved a total of four different marijuana-related questions.

In the House's 10th Norfolk district, represented by state Rep. James 
Vallee, D-Franklin, 60 percent of 18,960 voters said they support making 
marijuana a civil violation, "like a traffic ticket," instead of a criminal 
offense.

Also, 68 percent of 71,251 voters in the Worcester and Norfolk senatorial 
district, represented by Sen. Richard Moore, D-Uxbridge, voted in favor of 
decriminalizing the drug.

A question that asked whether "seriously ill patients" should be allowed to 
grow and possess marijuana for medicinal purposes was approved by 67 
percent of 18,738 voters in the House's 12th Worcester district, which 
includes Northborough and is represented by Rep. Harold Naughton, D-Clinton.

Steven Epstein, spokesman for the Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition, 
said the questions send a clear message to the 12 lawmakers whose 
constituents expressed support for legalizing marijuana.

"It's time," Epstein said. "It's time to abolish the law that allows police 
officers to make arrests for marijuana possession. That power is exercised 
arbitrarily."

Epstein's group collaborated with the Drug Policy Forum of Massachusetts to 
sponsor the ballot initiatives.

Whitney Taylor, the forum's executive director, said recent studies have 
debunked the popular belief that marijuana is a gateway drug that leads to 
the use of dangerous narcotics.

"We have to get past emotions and base our laws on science and human 
rights," she said. "The status quo isn't going to get us anywhere."

Despite their broad support among voters, the proposed reforms appear to 
face an uphill battle on Beacon Hill.

Moore, who serves as Senate chairman of the Health Care Committee, said he 
hasn't seen any convincing evidence that marijuana is a harmless drug.

"Until there is some scientific evidence or the federal laws permit some 
kind of use of it, I don't see what we can do to implement the ballot 
question," Moore said.

Using marijuana for medical purposes is "both inappropriate and illegal," 
Moore added.

"There are a lot of things that are popular but aren't of any benefit," he 
said.

Vallee, House chairman of the Criminal Justice Committee, said the 
questions' supporters haven't persuaded him that legalizing marijuana is 
the right course of action.

"I'm certainly open-minded about it, and I haven't been an obstructionist 
to the legislation," he said. "But from the standpoint of the legislative 
process, I don't think there's support among the legislators to do it."

Meanwhile, voters in Natick, Marlborough, Northborough, Southborough, 
Wellesley and Westborough were among those who supported a ballot question 
on granting equal custody rights to parents.

The initiative, sponsored by a Boston-based fathers' rights group called 
Fathers & Families, asks whether the courts, in separation and divorce 
cases, "shall uphold the fundamental right of both parents to the shared 
physical and legal custody of their children...unless one parent is found 
unfit or the parents agree otherwise, subject to the requirements of 
existing child support and abuse prevention laws."

Ned Holstein, president of Fathers & Families, said the question was 
supported by around 85 percent of approximately 600,000 voters across the 
state -- the largest margin of victory of any initiative or candidate on 
Tuesday's ballot, he added.

"It was an absolute landslide," Holstein said. "Ordinary people understand 
in their hearts that kids are hurt when they lose one of their parents. 
They're better off after a divorce when both parents can have an active and 
meaningful role in their lives."

The list of lawmakers whose districts were targeted by the ballot question 
included Rep. Stephen LeDuc, a Marlborough Democrat who is House chairman 
of the Children's Caucus; Rep. David Linsky, a Natick Democrat who serves 
on the Judiciary Committee; Rep. Alice Pesich, D-Wellesley; and Karyn 
Polito, R-Shrewsbury.

In Linsky's district, 80 percent of 18,730 voters supported the initiative.

"I support the general concept, but I would want to make sure judges still 
have the discretion they need to consider the best interests of the child," 
said Linsky, a lawyer. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake