Pubdate: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 Source: Vancouver Courier (CN BC) Copyright: 2004 Vancouver Courier Contact: http://www.vancourier.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/474 Author: Mike Howell Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mdma.htm (Ecstasy) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) GROW-OP LANDLORDS PAYING UP WITHOUT A WHIMPER The city has handed out almost $30,000 in penalties to landlords whose houses contained marijuana growing operations-and not one of the property owners has complained. Carlene Robbins, manager of the city's bylaw administration branch, said the $1,700 penalty issued to each landlord is a result of a new law to help the city recoup costs of busting a grow-op. "I'm actually quite surprised that I've had no negative reaction to it yet," said Robbins, noting the penalty is automatically added to a landlord's tax notice. "I really thought we would start getting people complaining. People are either ignoring the letter we sent or won't really realize [the penalty] until they get their tax notices that's going to show an additional charge on there. Then maybe they'll flip." City council approved the penalty June 22. The $1,700 charge is the estimated cost for police, firefighters and city inspectors to dismantle a grow-op. The charge also applies to clandestine drug labs, where chemical drugs such as crystal methamphetamine and ecstasy are manufactured. Police, however, haven't busted any labs since the new law came into effect. Robbins said the $1,700 penalty is on top of the $1,400 a landlord must pay the city to allow a former grow-op house or lab to be occupied by tenants again. This figure includes $840 to have the home inspected for infractions and then another $400 to $500 in permit fees to fix any problems noted by a city inspector. "And that doesn't include the costs of actually fixing it up," Robbins said. "It's a lot of money for the homeowner who's renting and legitimately innocent, and it was their tenant who was doing it." Const. Sarah Bloor, a media liaison officer for the Vancouver police department, said she couldn't estimate how many landlords knowingly rented their house to a marijuana grower. Bloor, however, said the city likely hasn't received any complaints about the $1,700 penalty because the landlords know it's their responsibility not to be fooled by their tenants. Police statistics for January to May show the department's drug unit busted 133 grow-ops. Bloor didn't have recent statistics, but said police bust an average of eight grow-ops per week, which translates to about 400 a year. Al Kemp, chief executive officer of the Rental Owners and Managers Association of B.C., says landlords aren't complaining for a different reason. "I'm probably going to be so embarrassed that I got duped that I'm not going to dispute the fine," Kemp said. Though Kemp agrees that landlords in cahoots with marijuana growers should be penalized, he doesn't believe innocent landlords should be fined. He said even the most diligent landlords-including the City of Richmond which owned two houses found to contain marijuana-can be fooled by a professional marijuana grower, who may use a new identity or have impeccable references. "The analogy I use is no different than if the corner grocery store gets robbed tonight, and tomorrow the city sends the owner a bill for $1,700 because he should have done something to prevent the robbery. Everybody would agree that's ridiculous, but it's no different." If B.C. Hydro's experience with marijuana growers and penalties is any indication, the city's $1,700 penalty will likely be paid. In the last fiscal year, Hydro sent out bills totalling $2.2 million to people who had stolen power, about 90 per cent of which was related to grow-ops. As of February, Hydro had recovered $1.3 million, with at least one customer willing to pay off his $30,000 bill in cash-not terribly surprising, since a pound of marijuana fetches about $2,500 to $3,200 on the street. - --- MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager