Pubdate: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution (GA) Copyright: 2003 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Contact: http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/28 Author: David Simpson DRUG COURT A PATH OUT OF TROUBLE DeKalb County Drug Court was a way out of jail for Tyrone Walker, but it wasn't a free pass. Facing a felony charge for repeated shoplifting, Walker agreed to an intensive schedule: group treatment six hours a day, four days a week; mandatory attendance at Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous or a similar group on the other three days a week; job counseling once a week; random drug tests at least once a week; and a visit to Drug Court every Friday. Like many Drug Court offenders, he also entered a "recovery residence" with curfews and tight rules. "It's a heavy hand in your life," Walker said. He was constantly in the company of counselors and legal officials: "They're nosy, they're in your business, they're confrontational." Not that he's complaining. He hasn't used drugs in more than seven months and credits Drug Court with helping him turn around his life and avoid up to 10 years in prison for felony shoplifting. Rehabilitation-oriented drug courts are a hot trend. They made their debut in 1989, and now there are nearly 1,200 nationwide, according to the National Association of Drug Court Professionals. DeKalb's court started last July; Cobb County followed in December. Hall County's began in 2001. Fulton County's Drug Court was launched about six years ago. The drug courts try to replace incarceration with intensive supervision and counseling to get at the root of what led to the participants' crime: drug addiction. The federal government encourages the idea and offers money, but local courts make their own decisions on what kind of offenders to accept and how to provide their treatment. The drug court advocacy group points to statistics showing substantial drops in drug use while offenders are in such programs. But many of the courts are new, and long-term studies will be needed to see how graduates fare in the years after leaving the programs. For now, those who launched DeKalb's Drug Court are fueled by short-term success stories such as Walker and the emotional rewards of working in a court where verbal combat is replaced by an all-for-one approach to get people off drugs. The Drug Court defendant knew he was in trouble. He had missed a group counseling session, an offense that can be a ticket to jail even though he spent the time arranging to live in a recovery residence run by a religious organization. Standing before Superior Court Judge Robert J. Castellani, the man's head dropped in relief when the judge told him his punishment would be community service. But he wasn't out of the woods. Castellani wanted to know: Would his most recent drug test come back from the lab clean? Yes, he said. Then the assistant district attorney, Anne Long, weighed in. She held thumb and forefinger an inch apart: "You were this close." Don't miss another session, she said. After the hearing Long hugged him. Such a scene can be startling for Drug Court defendants who have had experience with prosecutors doing their best to put them in jail, Long acknowledged afterward. "It's hard for them to understand that a prosecutor would care about them, would reach out to them," she said. Somebody cared Most of the offenders in Drug Court say "it's the first time somebody cared about them," said Castellani. The judge was instrumental in starting DeKalb's court and is its only judge. He, the public defenders, prosecutors, police and pre-trial services representatives work for the Drug Court in addition to their regular duties. The only person paid to work in Drug Court is Andy Cummings, the court administrator. The daily drug treatment program is provided under contract by the DeKalb Community Service Board. It costs about $19 per day for each of the 31 participants. Participants are expected to begin paying small fees after they find jobs. The judge notes it takes about $50 a day to keep someone in prison. Ninety-four percent of the Drug Court participants were assessed as having severe addictions . "We have made a conscious decision in our program to take the difficult cases," Castellani said. Violent offenders and drug dealers are turned down. Some eligible offenders say no thanks to Drug Court, said Long. "Some folks don't want that kind of intensive involvement," she said. And they don't really plan to quit using, so random drug testing at least once a week doesn't suit them, even if the alternative is time in jail followed by conventional probation. Once enrolled, 81 percent thus far have stayed in DeKalb's program. Cummings notes that only 20 percent of crack cocaine addicts who walk into community programs stay in treatment. Problems with family, work and education have to be solved to prevent relapses, said Claudia Saari, DeKalb's chief trial assistant public defender. "The jail may get them off drugs. It does not address their underlying problems," she said. The Drug Court team of judge, attorneys, police and court officials meets weekly to review every participant's progress. Finding ways for offenders to get along financially during and after treatment is a frequent topic. Some participants received six months' rent in recovery residences under a now-expired grant, and Cummings said other sources are being sought to revive that option. Participants are expected to stay in the program 18 months to two years. They move through three phases, with treatment time reduced in exchange for long periods of sobriety and other compliance. First to enter Walker and four other people this month became the first to enter Drug Court's "Phase 3." They have been drug-free for at least six months and satisfied court officials that they are on track to recovery. Their counseling sessions have been trimmed to two evenings a week to allow more time for jobs, though they still will attend a substance abuse meeting every day they are not in Drug Court treatment. The five have gotten to know each other intimately in the months of group therapy. They have a lot in common. All attended college and had jobs. None committed violent crimes. All would appear to be good candidates to conceal their drug use, to keep it under control. It didn't work that way. Walker, 34, is the son of two pastors. "I've been getting high since I was 8," he said. He liked the "adventure" as a child and was addicted by adulthood. Natalie DeVergee, 44, started smoking marijuana in college. She moved on to harder drugs while working as a flight attendant. Cheryl D. Lewis, 36, also started using in college. She later worked in a bank. Both DeVergee and Lewis did time in prison. Both have children. As a mother, Lewis said, "I was there, but I wasn't there. Now I'm fully there." De'Borrah Cheek, 43, "stole to support my habit." Her recovery began in the STOP program offered drug users in the DeKalb County Jail. Long, the assistant district attorney, visited her in jail to talk about another case and suggested Drug Court. "It was the best thing that could have happened to me," Cheek said. Asked how he got to Drug Court, Stanley Witcher, 40, said, "I feel it's God's will." The group nodded and murmured agreement. He included them in his assessment of why Drug Court has worked so far for him: "I've got friends who helped me turn my whole life around." In court at 8:30 a.m. Every Friday, every Drug Court participant not yet in Phase 3 is in Castellani's courtroom at 8:30 a.m. At a recent session, most could easily have been mistaken for courthouse employees in office-casual attire. The judge opened with a story about his attempt at high-wire walking. His point was that recovering drug addicts are a bit like rookie high-wire artists. "You're doing things you've never done before." Heads nodded around the courtroom. "It's new, it's different, it's a little bit intimidating," he said. And like high-wire walkers who often carry a pole for balance, he said, they should lean on each other, spouses and the court. Castellani dispensed encouragement while calling up each participant for one-on-one chats. Some were doing well, such as the woman who said, "I got five months today" of sobriety. The group applauded. Recovery is rockier for others. One woman wanted to move to the next phase of the program. Not yet, the judge said. "You've got to have patience. You don't want to do anything crazy or rash." The judge talked a lot about jobs and pointedly told one man he wasn't trying hard enough to find work. "It's not hard to do. I know you can do it." The judge asked several people, "What is the most important thing in your life right now?" The only right answer: "Recovery." Recovery never ends Recovery never ends, the Phase 3 participants realize. They are confident, though. And they are positive that Drug Court is more likely to work than prison. Walker calls prison "Street University," where criminal skills are taught. Witcher said his new outlook on life doesn't include crime. "Breaking the law doesn't even pass my mind. . . . I just want to go out, go to work and live like normal people do." - --- MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart