Pubdate: Thu, 20 Feb 2003
Source: Phoenix (PA Edu)
Copyright: 2003 The Phoenix
Contact:  http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/org/phoenix/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/869

NO NEED FOR SUBSTANCE-FREE HOUSING

They are an embattled minority, but they exist. Swattie after Swattie
who furtively ask the bartender for Coke, whose smoke detectors have
never once gone off during a moment of carelessness, who wake up
Saturday mornings with a clear head and a stable stomach. The reason
for the SWIL root beer kegger and the SCF water ice social. That's
right the substance-free live among us.

No one can deny that those of us who, for religious, moral, health or
personal reasons choose not to partake in Swarthmore's classic
tradition of recreational psychoactive substance use, often find
ourselves in sticky social situations. It can be awkward being the
only one who doesn't take a swig from the keg or a hit from the bong.
And it is true that a disproportionate number of Swarthmore social
events depend on alcohol for their excitement.

It's at times like this, when concerned Ville parents start talking
about the cesspool of corruption by the Crum again, when yet another
SAC-funded event breaks down into nude streaking and an alarming
number of reporters start writing exposes about "college alcohol
culture," that the deans start casting about for possible face-saving
measures.

Substance-free housing seems attractive on the face of it. You have a
whole dorm full of clean-living, urine-test-passing Swarthmore
students to point to. You have an excuse to start plugging more
substance-free-friendly events. You have responded to the issue of
substance use.

The problem with this is the problem with all simplistic institutional
solutions. By treating the problem as more simple than it is, we
create new problems.

What happens to the rest of the student body that gets lumped into the
"substance users" category, whether they drink an occasional glass of
champagne or shoot heroin? What happens to substance-free students who
get lumped into a single social group because of one life choice? What
happens to substance-free-dorm RAs who now have to become DEA
enforcers 24/7?

The issue of substance use is a valid one, but it deserves a more
thorough treatment than a housing designation.