Pubdate: Mon, 20 Oct 2003
Source: Boston Globe (MA)
Copyright: 2003 Globe Newspaper Company
Contact:  http://www.boston.com/globe/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/52
Author: Thanassis Cambanis
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/walters.htm (Walters, John)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing)

NEW BEDFORD MAY OFFER DRUG TESTS FOR STUDENTS

NEW BEDFORD -- A voluntary school drug-testing program proposed by the 
mayor and school superintendent would make this crime-plagued city the 
first in the Commonwealth to experiment with an approach heavily pushed by 
the White House drug enforcement leader. Civil liberties advocates 
criticized the plan, which would affect middle and high school students 
registered for random drug tests by their parents, but said its voluntary 
structure might protect it from a legal challenge. Mayor Frederick M. 
Kalisz Jr. said the "aggressive and innovative" voluntary testing concept 
proposed last week will pass constitutional muster and open a wider debate 
over the best way to intervene early and prevent teenage drug use."We're 
not out to violate anyone's civil rights. We're out to protect future 
generations," Kalisz said. Only parents would see the anonymous test 
results, he said, and students would face no sanctions under the program.

The proposed random drug testing plan has brought to Massachusetts a debate 
already raging in national drug policy circles.

John P. Walters, director of the White House Office of National Drug 
Control Policy, touted school-based drug testing as a "silver bullet" at a 
forum in Boston earlier this month and wants to make $8 million in federal 
funding available next year for school testing. He will promote the idea at 
a White House summit Oct. 30.

But the issue is also a political hot potato. Governor Mitt Romney has 
shied away from taking a position on the issue, and the Massachusetts Civil 
Liberties Union said it would challenge any program that forced students to 
take drug tests."This program might pass muster in Massachusetts, but 
random testing that wasn't voluntary certainly would appear to violate the 
state constitution," said Sarah Wunsch, a staff attorney at the American 
Civil Liberties Union. "The New Bedford program still raises practical 
questions about whether it's a waste of money."

Because the voluntary program would impose no sanctions on students who 
test positive for drug use, Kalisz said, it might not qualify for federal 
money intended for mandatory initiatives. But he prefers an approach that 
does not force anyone to participate.

"The sole objective is to help, not to punish," Kalisz said.

The plan is proving popular, if controversial, in New Bedford, where it was 
originally suggested to Kalisz at a forum of faith-based organizations 
earlier this month.

A major crime wave, including nine homicides this year, has struck New 
Bedford, a coastal city of 92,000 that is considered a major transit point 
for heroin traffickers.

Law enforcement officials blame much of the violence on drug use and 
trafficking and cite with concern the results of a federal survey released 
this year that show 6 percent of Massachusetts teenagers have used illicit 
drugs.

Under the New Bedford plan, parents could register middle and high school 
students for random drug testing. Parents would attend a workshop about 
drug treatment options if a child tests positive while the children would 
attend two workshops about drugs.

The registered students would be subject to random drug tests. A town nurse 
would collect urine samples at the campus and send them to a private lab 
for analysis.

Only the parent of the tested student would see the results. School 
officials would collect anonymous statistics.

"The key is that it's not mandatory. It's no different than a parent taking 
their child to a doctor's office for a drug test," said Matthew Thomas, the 
city solicitor. "We've structured this so that there's no law enforcement 
element."

Thomas believes the proposal would survive any legal challenges because it 
is voluntary and confidential.

Kalisz unveiled his preliminary drug testing plan to the New Bedford School 
Committee last Tuesday; he expects to have a final plan ready for a vote by 
January. The School Committee's initial reaction was lukewarm; none of the 
panel's members opposed the plan outright but several questioned its 
legality and effectiveness.

"I believe it's political grandstanding from the mayor," School Committee 
member Emilio Cruz said. "If it's such a good idea, we should be tested 
too, starting with the mayor."

Cruz said he was worried that confidential drug test results might be 
subpoenaed by law enforcement officials and that the school district might 
have difficulty paying for tests.

But several parents and students at New Bedford High School said a testing 
regime would probably deter drug use.

"I'm all for it," said Kathy Ramos, 34, as she waited in a minivan to pick 
up her freshman son after school.

"We have an open relationship, but there's some things he might not tell 
me," said Ramos, who added that she would sign him up for the testing 
program if it is approved by the School Committee.

Many teenagers at New Bedford High School, which has 3,500 students, said a 
trusting relationship would more effectively prevent drug use.

"They should trust us enough so we don't have to take drug tests," said 
Mallory Nobriega, 17, a senior.

Currently, the US Supreme Court has upheld mandatory school drug testing 
only for students who participate in sports and extracurricular activities. 
There have been no rulings on voluntary drug-testing programs.

According to a University of Michigan study published in the Journal of 
School Health in April 2003, 18 percent of surveyed schools implemented 
drug-testing policies between 1998 and 2001 and most focused on students 
suspected of drug use, rather than employing a random approach.

Few school districts around the country have voluntary drug testing 
programs. The most widely cited examples are in New Orleans, where at least 
three public schools now offer voluntary drug testing.

Glenn Koocher, executive director of the Massachusetts Association of 
School Committees, said school drug testing is a public health issue ripe 
for debate. But, he added, there would be "significant Constitutional 
barriers" and in all likelihood a fierce legal fight if New Bedford adopts 
the mayor's proposal.

"This will be like Christmas time in October for the lawyers," he said.

Some New Bedford parents like David Perry, 47, who has a daughter in high 
school, do not object to the program in principle, but wouldn't enroll 
their children.

"I'm not sure this is the correct way to address the problem," Perry said. 
"Having an open line of communication with your kids is much more important 
than taking a drug test."

But even some of the students who object to what they call an invasion of 
privacy believe a drug testing program could be effective.

"I don't think it's a good idea," said Jason Baptista, 17, a senior. "If 
they pass it, though, you're going to be thinking that if you try 
something, you might get caught by your mother. A lot of people would stay 
away from drugs."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom