Pubdate: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 Source: Maui News, The (HI) Contact: 2003 The Maui News Website: http://www.mauinews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2259 Note: To read about the "ice epidemic" in Hawaii, go to http://www.mapinc.org/areas/Hawaii . NOT ALL DRUGS ARE THE SAME Suggestions made by two top labor union officials this week came perilously close to "enabling" drug abuse in the work force. While testifying during a meeting of the Legislature's Joint House-Senate Task Force on Ice and Drug Abatement, President Harold Dias of the state AFL-CIO said the typical "two strikes" drug policy at most companies "is archaic, unrealistic, counterproductive (and) punitive." Eric Gill, financial secretary-treasurer of the Hawaii Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 5, was quoted as stressing the need to focus on drug abusers and not on all those who use drugs. Employers should have a self-interest in creating and maintaining an effective work force. That includes a responsibility on the part of top management - which sets policies - to be aware of working conditions that may include unnecessary stress leading to drug abuse. The work environment should be conducive to employees seeking and getting help before their function is impaired. This is not entirely a new problem. Alcoholism and marijuana and cocaine use have been chronic work-force problems for decades. In terms of work functionality and addiction, these older drugs are mild compared to the reported effects of crystal methamphetamine, or ice. Government's role in all of this should be limited to establishing harsh punishment for anyone profiting from the manufacture, distribution or sale of ice and to supporting the creation of effective rehabilitation for users. As shown by the Maui and Oahu drug courts, a part of effective rehabilitation for those addicted to ice is the threat of prison if the individual fails to follow a strict regimen of counseling and drug testing. In the private work force, the primary test must be functionality and a willingness to seek treatment before use becomes abuse. The only enforcement threat an employer should have is the loss of the job, and in some cases that is what it will take before an individual admits and begins to deal with his or her drug problem. >From an employer's standpoint, it all begins with treating employees as human beings instead of faceless cogs in a machine, offering help when requested without punishment. - --- MAP posted-by: Doc-Hawk