Pubdate: Tue, 07 Oct 2003
Source: Guelph Mercury (CN ON)
Copyright: 2003 Guelph Mercury Newspapers Limited
Contact:  http://www.guelphmercury.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1418

COURT RULING ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA EXPECTED TODAY

Ontario Appeal Court Decision Could Force Ottawa To Continue Supplying 
Legal Pot

Canadians who are allowed to use medicinal marijuana could be forced to buy 
their medicine from the black market if a decision by the Ontario Court of 
Appeal, expected today, rules that the federal government doesn't have to 
provide pot to critically ill people.

Alison Myrden, one of the litigants in the case, said the issue of having a 
legal supply of marijuana is "critical" for her because the drug -- which 
she takes instead of more than 30 pills and morphine -- helps her deal with 
the pain of chronic progressive multiple sclerosis and other ailments.

"I'm not walking away without winning," she said. "I've been fighting to 
get the government to supply me for four years. That's all I want. I never 
wanted to break the law."

Myrden said she hasn't yet applied to receive the government-grown 
marijuana due to quality concerns.

So far, the pot being grown in Flin Flon, Man., by a company on contract to 
the government hasn't had good reviews.

In today's ruling, the Ontario court could force the government to continue 
supplying pot to medicinal users, while allowing it to uphold the laws 
prohibiting pot possession.

The court could also rule the government doesn't have to provide a legal 
source of pot to medicinal users, and continue to prohibit possession of 
the drug. That would mean that people who are approved to use the drug 
would have to turn to an illegal supply source.

Another possibility is the court ruling that the laws prohibiting marijuana 
possession are unconstitutional and hurt those who use pot for medical reasons.

Although the court can make further comments about Canada's medicinal 
marijuana program, those are three possible outcomes of the decision, said 
Alan Young, one of the lawyers arguing the case for seven ill people who 
sued the government for a legal source of pot.

"The decision could effectively recriminalize marijuana or it could confirm 
that the law does not exist because of deficiencies in the medical 
program," Young said in an interview Monday.

While that might decriminalize the possession of small amounts of pot, the 
issue of who could distribute marijuana would still have to be dealt with, 
he said.

"Just because you decriminalize marijuana possession doesn't mean that the 
people who are going to distribute to medical users will be allowed to do 
so," Young said, but added that would be the first step towards 
decriminalizing the drug and establishing legal distribution channels in 
Canada.

The appeal stems from a case in January in which Ontario Superior Court 
Justice Sidney Lederman ruled it was unfair for the federal government to 
allow people to use medicinal marijuana but put them in a position where 
they have to buy it from the black market because Ottawa doesn't provide 
legal access to cannabis.

Lederman gave the government a July 9 deadline to either fix the 
regulations or supply the pot itself. As a result, the government 
instituted an interim policy where it supplies pot at set prices to 
approved users.

If the court rules that the government doesn't have to provide marijuana to 
medicinal users, Young expects the government will scrap its current supply 
plan.

"I would say that it is a foregone conclusion that if the court relieves 
(the government) of a constitutional obligation to distribute (marijuana), 
they will cease and desist within minutes," Young said.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens