Pubdate: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 Source: Oklahoman, The (OK) Copyright: 2003 The Oklahoma Publishing Co. Contact: http://www.oklahoman.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/318 Author: Anthony M. Kennedy MANDATORY SENTENCES ARE UNJUST Editor's Note: Anthony M. Kennedy, associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, spoke to the American Bar Association in San Francisco last month about the rising rate of prison populations across the country. We reprint today part of his prepared text: WERE we to enter the hidden world of punishment, we should be startled by what we see. Consider its remarkable scale. The nationwide inmate population today is about 2.1 million people. In California, even as we meet, this state alone keeps over 160,000 persons behind bars. In countries such as England, Italy, France and Germany, the incarceration rate is about 1 in 1,000 persons. In the United States it is about 1 in 143. We must confront another reality. Nationwide, more than 40 percent of the prison population consists of African-American inmates. About 10 percent of African-American men in their mid-to late 20s are behind bars. In some cities, more than 50 percent of young African-American men are under the supervision of the criminal justice system. While economic costs, defined in simple dollar terms, are secondary to human costs, they do illustrate the scale of the criminal justice system. The cost of housing, feeding and caring for the inmate population in the United States is over $40 billion per year. In California alone, the cost of maintaining each inmate in the correctional system is about $26,000 per year. And despite the high expenditures in prison, there remain urgent, unmet needs in the prison system. To compare prison costs with the cost of educating school children is, to some extent, to compare apples with oranges, because the state must assume the full burden of housing, subsistence and medical care for prisoners. Yet the statistics are troubling. When it costs so much more to incarcerate a prisoner than to educate a child, we should take special care to ensure that we are not incarcerating too many persons for too long. It requires one with more expertise in the area than I possess to offer a complete analysis, but it does seem justified to say this: Our resources are misspent, our punishments too severe, our sentences too long. In the federal system the sentencing guidelines are responsible in part for the increase in prison terms. In my view the guidelines were, and are, necessary. Before they were in place, a wide disparity existed among the sentences given by different judges, and even among sentences given by a single judge. As my colleague Justice Breyer has pointed out, however, the compromise that led to the guidelines led also to an increase in the length of prison terms. We should revisit this compromise. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines should be revised downward. By contrast to the guidelines, I can accept neither the necessity nor the wisdom of federal mandatory minimum sentences. In too many cases, mandatory minimum sentences are unwise and unjust. Consider this case: A young man with no previous serious offense is stopped on the George Washington Memorial Parkway near Washington, D.C., by United States Park Police. He is stopped for not wearing a seat belt. A search of the car follows and leads to the discovery of just over five grams of crack cocaine in the trunk. The young man is indicted in federal court. He faces a mandatory minimum sentence of five years. If he had taken an exit and left the federal road, his sentence likely would have been measured in terms of months, not years. United States marshals can recount the experience of leading a young man away from his family to begin serving his term. His mother says, "How long will my boy be gone?" They say "10 years" or "15 years." Ladies and gentlemen, I submit to you that a 20-year-old does not know how long 10 or 15 years is. One day in prison is longer than almost any day you and I have had to endure. Alexander Solzhenitsyn describes just one day in prison in the literary classic "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich." Denisovich had a 10- year sentence. At one point he multiplies the long days in these long years by 10. Here is his final reflection: "The end of an unclouded day. Almost a happy one. Just one of the three thousand six hundred and fifty-three days of his sentence, from bell to bell. The extra three were for leap years." - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens