Pubdate: Wed, 24 Apr 2002
Source: Harvard Crimson (MA Edu)
Copyright: 2002, The Harvard Crimson, Inc.
Contact:  http://www.thecrimson.harvard.edu/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/794
Author: Ari Z. Weisbard, Crimson Staff Writer

ACTIVIST ATTACKS DRUG ENFORCEMENT POLICIES

The enforcement of US drug policies is counterproductive and discriminates 
against minorities, Deborah J. Small of the Drug Policy Alliance told an 
audience at the Kennedy School of Government (KSG) yesterday. In her 
speech,"Racism and the War on Drugs," Small questioned the logic behind 
what she described as indiscriminate outlawing of drug use.

Small, who serves as director of public policy and community outreach for 
the Drug Policy Alliance, a national organization, began her speech by 
describing how violence stemming from the illegal drug market had affected 
her personally.

Shortly after Small graduated from college, two of her family members were 
killed by drug-related violence, she told the audience.

"My brother, who was 21 at the time, was beaten to death in Atlanta, 
Georgia and my father was shot eight months later," Small said. "When you 
have a loved one who dies in that way, the police don't try to solve the 
crime."

Small said that although drug use was relatively consistent across racial 
groups, a disproportionate number of those arrested or convicted for drug 
use "are poor people or people of color."

"If our drug enforcement were really about drugs, you would expect people 
to be arrested proportionally," she said. "But 94 percent of people 
arrested in New York are black or Latino and, in California, it's 60 percent."

Small said that drug policy in America has always been tinged with racism.

"Marijuana laws began in response to Mexicans in the southwest using that 
drug," she said.

Instead of the current system of incarcerating drug offenders, Small 
advocated policies aimed at "harm reduction" rather than prohibition.

She cited drunk driving laws and labelling regulations aimed at the liquor 
industry as examples of successful "harm reduction" policies.

Small frequently compared the contemporary debate about drug laws to 
discussions about prohibition during the early 20th century.

"The problems of alcohol prohibition were worse than the problems 
associated with alcohol itself," Small said.

Small also criticized policy-makers who take a purely punitive approach to 
drug policy.

After enumerating several sanctions used against drug offenders--the 
"three-strikes" rule, eviction from public housing, and loss of the ability 
to receive student loans or welfare--Small said that current policies 
punish drug users rather than promote recovery.

"With all the barriers we put in front of a person trying to reintegrate 
into society, should we be surprised that so many people who are released 
from jail end up going back there?" she said.

Small also took issue with the government's recent anti-drug campaign-- 
which included commercials that ran during the Super Bowl--that implied 
that drug users supported terrorist networks.

"Lots of petroleum dollars end up supporting terrorism, too," Small said. 
"Is it people's use of the drugs that's supporting terrorism or is it the 
fact that drugs are illegal?" she said.

The talk, sponsored by several student organizations including Harvard 
Students for Prison Reform (HSPR), is part of a week of events leading up 
to a conference on prison reform this Saturday.

[PHOTO CAPTION] DEBORAH J. SMALL, director of public policy and community 
outreach of the Drug Policy Alliance, criticized current drug policy 
yesterday at the Belfer Center at the Kennedy School of Government.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom