Pubdate: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 Source: Denver Rocky Mountain News (CO) Copyright: 2002, Denver Publishing Co. Contact: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/371 Author: Evelyn Wallace OUTCOME OF TATTERED COVER CASE TROUBLING As much as I believe in the personal freedoms afforded to U.S. citizens, something about the ruling concerning Tattered Cover's privacy policy bothers me ("Tattered Cover wins ruling," Rocky Mountain News, April 9). Perhaps it's because I am adamant, also, that the rights of an individual should never supersede the rights or protection of the majority of the people. If this was about whether a housewife had the right to read pornography or a child having access to a book on communism, it might offend me morally, but obviously doesn't threaten my life or liberties. Here, it is the actual subject matter that makes all the difference. The reading habits of a methamphetamine dealer concern me greatly, as much as my right to know whether a convicted sex offender resides in my neighborhood or whether my next-door neighbor is making bombs. If such knowledge can prevent or convict a criminal of committing crimes, then such knowledge is imperative. Additionally, even when you use a broad scope in interpreting the First and Fourth amendments, I see no area of either that promises privacy. Evelyn Wallace Denver - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens