Pubdate: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 Source: Chicago Sun-Times (IL) Copyright: 2002 The Sun-Times Co. Contact: http://www.suntimes.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/81 Author: Robert Sharpe, Stephen Young Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n604/a11.html Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) WASTE OF TIME Cindy Richards' March 27 column was right on target. The U.S. Supreme Court will review an Oklahoma school district's drug-testing policy on constitutional grounds, but there are compelling health reasons to oppose the invasive policy. Student involvement in extracurricular activities has been shown to reduce drug use. Forcing students to undergo degrading drug tests as a prerequisite will only discourage such activities. Drug-testing may also compel smokers of relatively harmless marijuana to switch to harder drugs to avoid testing positive. Despite a short-lived high, marijuana is the only drug that stays in the body long enough to make urinalysis a deterrent. Marijuana's organic metabolites are fat-soluble and can linger for weeks. Synthetic hard drugs are water-soluble and exit the body quickly. A student who takes Ecstasy, OxyContin, or meth on Friday night will likely test clean on Monday morning. If you think students don't know this, think again. The most commonly abused drug and the one most closely associated with violent behavior is almost impossible to detect with urinalysis. That drug is alcohol, and it takes far more lives every year than all illegal drugs combined. Instead of wasting money on counterproductive drug tests, schools should invest in reality-based drug education. Robert Sharpe, program officer, Drug Policy Alliance, Washington, D.C. ----- DON'T PRE-JUDGE KIDS I was glad to see "Just say no to drug tests" by Cindy Richards [column, March 27]. I hope more people begin to realize that drug-testing students serves little purpose other than to discourage troubled kids from joining extracurricular activities. Martin Luther King Jr. said he dreamed of a place where children would be judged by the content of their character. More and more, we judge young people by the content of their urine. What would King think about that? Stephen Young, Roselle - --- MAP posted-by: Ariel