Pubdate: Wed, 20 Mar 2002
Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution (GA)
Copyright: 2002 Cox Interactive Media.
Contact:  http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/28
Author: Anne Gearan

SUPREME COURT: DRUG TESTS FOR STUDENTS MAY BROADEN

Washington --- Several Supreme Court justices embraced the idea of random 
drug tests for students involved in after-school activities ranging from 
band to chess club. It was seen as a major step toward allowing 
drug-testing for all students.

A lawyer for a rural Oklahoma school district argued Tuesday that random 
drug tests for some students was a reasonable response to a general problem 
of drug use among young people.

If the court agrees, it would allow far broader scrutiny of the majority of 
the nation's 24 million high school students who participate in 
extracurricular activities.

''Do you think any school in the United States does not have a drug 
problem?'' Justice Antonin Scalia asked rhetorically at one point.

The court already has ruled that schools may test athletes for drugs. That 
1995 ruling made an exception to the general rule that authorities must 
have some specific reason to suspect wrongdoing before targeting someone 
for search.

Students who routinely strip naked in a locker room have a lower 
expectation of privacy than other students, the court reasoned then. 
Students who used drugs while playing vigorous sports also could be a 
danger to themselves or others, the court said.

Justice Stephen Breyer suggested that the Oklahoma school district took the 
logical next step. Breyer voted with the majority to approve testing of 
athletes, and he noted on Tuesday, ''It's hard for me to see if I came out 
one way [then] I'd come out different here.''

The court's ruling in the current case, expected by summer, should fill in 
a major question left from the 1995 ruling: whether the factors that made 
drug testing acceptable for athletes apply to other after-school 
activities, or even students at large.

Wider drug testing remains relatively rare among the nation's 15,500 public 
school districts.

Some members of the Tecumseh, Okla., school board wanted to test all 
students, but lawyers advised limiting tests to students involved in 
competitive after-school activities.

The Bush administration is backing the school district, as is a long list 
of organizations, including the Drug-Free Schools Coalition and the 
National School Boards Association.

''I think this is a deterrent,'' school district lawyer Linda Meoli argued. 
''If they want to audition or go out for one of these competitive 
activities, they know'' drug testing is a requirement.

In what might be the Bush administration's first such statement, Deputy 
Solicitor General Paul Clement said universal testing would be constitutional.

Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and David Souter were the most vocal in 
questioning the Tecumseh policy.

O'Connor noted that lower-court testimony indicated students involved in 
seemingly wholesome after-school activities were less likely than their 
peers to get into trouble with drugs.

The Tecumseh testing program ran for part of two school years. It was 
suspended after Lindsey Earls, captain of the school academic quiz team and 
a self-described ''goodie two-shoes,'' sued over a 1998 drug test. She 
passed the test.

''The constitutional rights of a lot of students are at stake here,'' Earls 
said after Tuesday's oral argument session.

''My biggest fear is there will be students drug-tested all over, students 
whose privacy is invaded,'' said Earls, now a freshman at Dartmouth College.

The Tecumseh policy covered a range of voluntary clubs and sports, 
including the Future Farmers of America club, cheerleading and football. 
Students were tested at the beginning of the school year. Thereafter, tests 
were random.

Overall, 505 high school students were tested for drug use. Three students, 
all of them athletes, tested positive, Earls' lawyer said.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart