Pubdate: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 Source: Dallas Morning News (TX) Copyright: 2002 The Dallas Morning News Contact: http://www.dallasnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/117 Author: Holly Becka, The Dallas Morning News DRUG STING APPEALS DENIED Men Won't Get New Trials, Despite Involvement Of Discredited Informant Two men caught in early drug stings arranged by a now-discredited police informant won't get out of prison anytime soon. The state's highest criminal appellate court has denied the appeals of Dario Luna Medrano and Jose Santos Gonzalez - even though prosecutors and a judge joined their lawyer in requesting new trials because of witness credibility problems. The discredited witness is Enrique Alonso, the police informant who pleaded guilty in September to federal charges stemming from dozens of drug arrests involving fake substances. The men's appeals - filed in May - are believed to be the first considered by the Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin that raise concerns about Mr. Alonso's credibility. District Attorney Bill Hill said his office currently has no plans to aid Mr. Medrano or Mr. Gonzalez - by seeking a pardon - because their cases involved real drugs. Mr. Hill noted that other evidence bolsters testimony or information Mr. Alonso provided. Also, Mr. Medrano had two other unrelated drug charges. Also Online Fake drugs, real people: The evolution of a scandal. A News 8 timeline featuring in-depth information, facts and figures. "Based on the facts that these were 6 pounds of pure cocaine, with corroborating evidence, we are satisfied that we have done everything that we agreed to do," Mr. Hill said. "We do not feel that we need to do anything else." Two independent appellate specialists said the attorney for the men, Eric Smenner, bears some responsibility for the rejection because he failed to make a proper argument. Brian Wice, a Houston lawyer who specializes in appellate work and gives lectures on the subject across the state, said Mr. Smenner got into a credibility fight with prosecutors that he couldn't win. In response, Mr. Smenner said his hands were tied by the facts of the case. He noted that it wasn't until last month that Mr. Alonso admitted lying in a real drug case. "There just wasn't anything else left available," Mr. Smenner said. "The sole basis of [appeal] in this case was the informant was not reliable and it was discovered after the conviction." Mr. Hill said that he would review the men's cases - and those of other defendants with denied appeals - to determine if his office should help them further. At least two other defendants remain in prison with convictions involving Mr. Alonso's participation. "We are reviewing our options on each one of these defendants," Mr. Hill said. He said he wasn't reneging on his promise to help defendants in cases involving Mr. Alonso: "Where I draw the line is if they're real drugs and if the informant can be corroborated. If they're fake drugs, I'll go down to the governor's office and try to go above what we agreed to. But if they're real drugs and the informant can be corroborated, we've done everything that we agreed to do." Dallas police arrested Mr. Medrano, 26, and Mr. Gonzalez, 33, in December 1999 after a cocaine deal arranged by Mr. Alonso, who at the time was "working off" his own narcotics cases. He later became one of the Dallas Police Department's highest paid informants. Federal authorities have been investigating the fake-drug scandal since January, three months after the first large haul of purported cocaine turned out to be finely ground Sheetrock. Senior Cpl. Mark Delapaz and Officer Eddie Herrera, the officers on many of the fake-drug cases, remain on paid leave. The district attorney's office has dismissed more than 85 drug cases considered tainted by involvement from the officers, Mr. Alonso or several of his "subcontractor" informants. Mr. Alonso signed an affidavit last month admitting he perjured himself to obtain a conviction against Jaime Chavez, whose case involved real drugs. A judge has allowed Mr. Chavez to leave prison on a personal recognizance bond until the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reviews his case. He had been imprisoned more than two years after a jury convicted him. Mr. Alonso has not publicly admitted lying in other cases. His attorney, Bruce Anton, said Monday that he was unfamiliar with Mr. Gonzalez' or Mr. Medrano's cases. But, Mr. Anton said he would be glad to look into the matter. "If people [lawyers] feel they have clients who have been wrongly convicted, they should contact the Department of Justice or me," Mr. Anton said. Attorney Frustrated Mr. Smenner, who donated his time on the men's appeal because his firm handled their cases, said he's been left frustrated by the entire situation. "If their cases would have come up after all this was discovered, there would have been a different result," he said. "I just feel like there should be an equitable solution here, but it's such a wooden institution, it's just not there." Mr. Smenner learned in mid-September that the Court of Criminal Appeals denied the men's appeals without explanation. In the appeals, he noted that Mr. Alonso's credibility problems had surfaced long after his clients' charges and alleged that prosecutors denied him information about Mr. Alonso that would have changed the outcome of the cases. Mr. Wice, a critic of many of the Court of Criminal Appeals' decisions, said he couldn't find fault with their ruling in Mr. Gonzalez's or Mr. Medrano's case. He also said the men's cases might not warrant a new trial under the law - despite the credibility problems that surfaced with Mr. Alonso. The informant may have been a liar, "but unless you can show a nexus between his misconduct and the entrance of a guilty plea or a guilty verdict, then you don't get a get-out-of-jail-free card." - --- MAP posted-by: Beth