Pubdate: Mon, 28 Oct 2002
Source: Nevada Appeal (Carson City, NV)
Contact:  2002 Nevada Appeal
Author: Sandra Chereb, Associated Press Writer 
Cited: Marijuana Policy Project ( )
Bookmark: (Decrim/Legalization) (Nevadans for Responsible Law Enforcement) (Question 9 (NV)


RENO -- People who argue Nevada is a live-and-let-live state can point to a
marijuana question on the November ballot as proof. But another ballot
proposal to ban same-sex marriages could prove them wrong.

Question 2, approved by 70 percent of voters in 2000 and up for a second,
final vote Nov. 5, would amend the Nevada Constitution to define marriage as
only between a man and woman.

The proposal, labeled by critics as anti-gay bigotry, contrasts sharply with
Nevada's Question 9, to let adults possess up to 3 ounces of marijuana for
personal use.

Question 9 is up for its first vote. If approved, it would appear again on
the November 2004 ballot for a final vote. Then state legislators would have
to craft rules for growing, taxing and distributing the drug through
state-licensed stores.

Whether Question 9 could ever take effect is unclear since federal law bans
marijuana possession, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last year that states
can't make exceptions for medical use.

But is a state that thrives on gambling and tolerates prostitution ready to
embrace the most liberal marijuana laws in the country?

"I don't think Nevadans are willing to go that far yet," said Eric Herzik, a
political science professor at the University of Nevada, Reno.

Two years ago, Nevadans gave final approval to a constitutional amendment
allowing ill people to use and obtain marijuana for medical purposes.

Last year, the state Legislature made possession of less than an ounce a
misdemeanor. Before that, possession of even minute amounts could be
punished as a felony,

The latest campaign was spearheaded by Nevadans for Responsible Law
Enforcement, an offshoot of the Washington D.C.-based Marijuana Policy

The Nevada group, headed by Billy Rogers, gathered nearly 75,000 signatures
around the state to put the question on the Nov. 5 ballot.

Why target Nevada?

"Because we're a very individualistic state," Herzik surmised. "We're the
leaders in vice. We give away drinks; we have legalized prostitution;
gambling is the backbone of our economy. Why not marijuana?"

Rogers says the issue boils down to law enforcement priorities.

"This initiative will allow the police to spend more time going after
murderers, rapists and other violent criminals," he said.

Opponents, many in law enforcement, call that argument a smoke screen. They
maintain that legalizing pot would lead to more drug abuse among youth and
undermine Nevada's DUI laws by requiring prosecutors to prove someone was
driving "dangerously" while under the influence of marijuana.

The issue has drawn the attention of the Bush administration, prompting two
visits to Nevada by federal drug czar John P. Walters and one by Drug
Enforcement Agency Director Asa Hutchinson to lobby against it.

"This is a con and it's insulting to the voters of the state in which it is
presented," Walters said during a recent trip to Reno.

Advocates of Question 9 think they have a shot at voter approval. But
opponents of the gay marriage prohibition, Question 2, seem resigned to its
passage even though they're making a last-ditch effort to defeat it.

"The only question is, does it do better or worse than last time," Herzik
said in discussing the odds for approval of Question 2 on Nov. 5.

In terms of money, there's no contest.

"The reality is we're tremendously out-funded again," said Liz Moore of
Equal Rights Nevada in Las Vegas. "American Politics 101 -- look who has the
most money and they'll likely win."

Richard Ziser, chairman of the Coalition for the Protection of Marriage,
said his group raised about $2 million during the two-year effort -- most
coming in the last election season.

So far this year, opponents have raised about $40,000, Moore said.

Backers say the constitutional provision is needed to protect Nevada from
having to honor civil unions of gay couples in other states.

Critics -- among them Miss Nevada Teresa Benitez and some clergy, call the
ballot question bigoted and discriminatory against gays and lesbians.

"I think unfortunately Question 2 will pass," said Benitez, who during last
month's Miss America's pageant performed an oratory of a statement by the
father of Matthew Shepard, 21, a gay University of Wyoming freshman who was
tied to a fence and beaten to death in 1998.

Benitez said the vote "will be a litmus test for Nevadans to see if we are a
community of compassion and acceptance."

Nevada's Catholic bishops endorsed the measure with some reservations, but
couched their opposition by adding they respect others who "follow their
consciences" and believe differently.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Doc-Hawk