Pubdate: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 Source: Philadelphia Inquirer, The (PA) Copyright: 2002 Philadelphia Newspapers Inc Contact: http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/340 Author: Dick Polman Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?163 (Question 9 (NV)) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?168 (Lewis, Peter) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?162 (Nevadans for Responsible Law Enforcement) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/walters.htm (Walters, John) DRUG WAR'S NEW FRONT: BALLOT BOX Nevadans To Vote On Legalizing Marijuana. LAS VEGAS - The dawn sky above Sin City was streaked with pink as John Walters' bodyguards scanned the street for marijuana terrorists. Satisfied that the perimeter was secure, they put the federal drug czar in his van. They were just being careful, an aide said. Their intelligence indicates that some Nevada freedom-lovers don't appreciate Walters' coming out here to inveigh against the current movement to legalize marijuana. But because Nevadans might soon try to end pot prohibition - something that has never happened in America, not in 30 years of sporadic drug reform - Walters says that "it's my responsibility to push back. We can't allow major government institutions to become facilitators for drug-dealing and drug addiction." Nevadans, who already treat most vices as revenue, are weighing a serious plan that a group bankrolled by insurance magnate Peter Lewis has put on the Nov. 5 ballot: Legalize adult possession of 3 ounces or less, and allow the state to grow it, distribute it, sell it and tax it. Under state rules, a ballot item must pass twice to become law. This means that a yes vote on legalization would need to be repeated in 2004, but Nevadans have already approved the medical use of marijuana by saying yes twice - the second time, in 2000, by a larger majority. Early voting in Nevada's elections began this weekend. And with money from Lewis and two other billionaire businessmen, marijuana initiatives are also on the ballot in Ohio (steering offenders to treatment, not prison) and in Arizona (reducing small possession from a felony to a civil fine). Walters thinks this is dream-world stuff, "a 2 a.m. dorm-room conversation," but Nevada's polls are dead even - and not just because the state already hosts 214 medical marijuana patients. It's also because legalization advocates are painting themselves as wholesome Americans, not party animals anxious to put the Grateful Dead on the state seal. They chose a mainstream name, Nevadans for Responsible Law Enforcement (even though no police agencies support them). They're championed by a Vegas assemblywoman who looks like a soccer mom from central casting. And they urge their followers to wear "business casual." At a rally the other day, organizer Tyler Whitmire wore a nice pair of blue Chaps and pinned his ponytail under his cap. And when a security guard bellowed that some demonstrators were standing on private property, they nudged their shoes onto the sidewalk and genially cried out, "No problem, sir!... Thank you, man!... Please don't hate me!" Campaign manager Billy Rogers, a veteran Texas Democrat, declared in his office: "This is not a pothead operation. This isn't about wanting to get high. This is about clear eyes and clear minds. It's not like six months ago I had hair down to my ass. I didn't. This is about changing laws that are wrong." Their beef is that, under current law, Nevada's authorities can slap you with a felony and four years in prison for possessing more than an ounce. And how is that fair, they say, when so little else in Nevada is illegal? It's not illegal to drive without a seat belt; or to promenade on the Strip with an open bottle of beer; or to summon a "private dancer" to your hotel room, simply by dialing a phone number posted on a billboard. Besides, they say, why should firing up a doobie in the privacy of home be deemed unacceptable in a town like Vegas, where, just the other day, the mayor was strolling around with some zaftig showgirls, swilling gin from an oversize martini glass? It's rumored that a lot of police silently support the pot push; one retired officer, Andy Anderson, shows up in a pro-pot TV ad. Another ex-cop, Richard Mack, says he junked his hard-line attitude while working undercover. He became golfing buddies with one suspect - "a law-abiding guy who worked, took care of his family, and just liked to take the edge off at night by lighting a joint." "We should leave those people alone. I'm a conservative guy, and isn't that what Republicans say they want - limited government? But is the Bush administration any different from the big-government types? Only difference is, they don't party as much in the White House as the other side did." But to Rick Barela, a well-muscled sergeant with the Vegas Metro Police, legalization would sow chaos: "We'd have vehicular traffic from all the border states, people driving in just to purchase and party. Your line cop already has enough problems. "We see what alcohol does; we're the ones pulling the bodies out of cars. We already can't keep drugs out of the hands of children. Yet somehow these legalization folks seem to think that throwing another drug into the mix is a good thing." That's what bothers Erin Breen, a university worker with a teenage daughter: "Look, there's still something to be said for keeping it on the books as illegal. It gives parents a tool, it sets some limits, because the child thinks, 'I'm going to get my butt kicked if I get caught.' " Actually, pot would remain illegal for teens, but everyone seems to be fudging the facts as passions run high. At legalization headquarters, Billy Rogers complains that 3,742 Nevadans were busted for pot in 2000, but omits that, last year, state lawmakers reduced possession of an ounce or less to a misdemeanor and a $600 fine. Drug czar Walters, meanwhile, says that "more people are coming into [addiction] treatment for marijuana than for any other illegal drug," yet that is contradicted by his own office. Nevada treatment admission statistics show that in 2000, methamphetamine topped the list by a wide margin. Then there's the squabble over how many pot cigarettes would be permitted by law. Rogers says 3 ounces equals 80 joints (if rolled tightly). Police and prosecutors, at various times, have said 90, 120, 250, or 300 (if rolled loosely). Rogers fears that Nevadans will vote no if a big number sticks. That debate sounds comedic, but not to Holly Brady. A longtime Vegas resident, she smokes 3 ounces a month to ease the pain of multiple sclerosis. She and her husband, Tom, a former pit boss at Bally's in Atlantic City, view marijuana as "a plant that God put on this Earth for us" - and they want easier access. Nevada has a Catch-22. Like eight other states, it allows ailing adults to smoke pot under a doctor's care - but it doesn't provide it. Patients must find it on their own, from illegal sources, or grow their own with seeds illegally obtained. Tom Brady said, "You've got to ask around, same as you'd do it in Cherry Hill." But they can't count on a steady supply. "All I know is, the pain goes away immediately," said Holly Brady, who has toked for 10 years. "I can get myself together enough to go with Tom to watch football at the sports parlors. Like, it's noon now, and I've had three joints already. It doesn't make me act like Cheech and Chong. It's about survival." For drug czar Walters, the medical patients are a PR problem; as he said in his motorcade, "nobody wants to deny comfort to suffering people." But he dismissed marijuana as "snake oil," and said the legalization crowd was trying "to use suffering people for political purposes. It's immoral." So the feds cede nothing. Walters figures that if legalization wins Round One in Nevada, he can still work to defeat it in 2004. And even if it wins twice, he says the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration would move in and shut down any sales operation. "I respect the frontier spirit," he said, "but we're not raised by wolves. We can't act as if we're all on our own individual islands. A civilized society has to maintain the public health and safety. Society has to provide some direction. There has to be a partnership between freedom and responsibility." - --- MAP posted-by: Tom