Pubdate: Wed, 16 Oct 2002
Source: Times-Picayune, The (LA)
Copyright: 2002 The Times-Picayune
Contact:  http://www.nola.com/t-p/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/848
Author: Susan Finch

COURT UPHOLDS DRUG CONVICTION

Woman Was Sitting Near Crack Cocaine

A closely divided Louisiana Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the 
cocaine-possession conviction of a New Orleans woman arrested inside 
someone else's home, where police found a small amount of the drug on a 
coffee table near where she sat.

In 4-3 ruling, the court reinstated the conviction of Mary Toups, arrested 
in 1999 when police found her chatting with a suspected drug dealer at his 
New Orleans home in front of a coffee table where two pieces of crack 
cocaine, three crack pipes and a razor blade were in plain view.

The justices split over whether a defendant's being where illegal drugs are 
located or associating with someone who possesses such drugs proves what 
the law calls "constructive" possession -- that is, dominion or control -- 
of the contraband.

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeal in May had thrown out Toups' conviction, 
saying the evidence against her was insufficient. The Supreme Court 
majority, led by Associate Justice Jeffrey Victory, said there was plenty 
to convince "a rational trier of fact" beyond a reasonable doubt that Toups 
exercised possession of the crack cocaine on the coffee table.

Victory, joined by Associate Justices Catherine Kimball, Chet Traylor and 
John Weimer, said it was reasonable to conclude that Stanley Williams, from 
whom undercover officers had made a drug buy earlier in the day, would not 
sit at his coffee table with crack cocaine in plain view ready to be smoked 
with someone he didn't know or "did not know would be amenable to using the 
drugs."

Another factor pointing to Toups' guilt was the fact that she gave police a 
phony name, Mary Billiot, when they arrested her, the majority said.

But Chief Justice Pascal Calogero and Associate Justices Bernette Johnson 
and Jeanette Knoll dissented.

"Neither the defendant's mere presence in an area where drugs are located 
nor the defendant's mere association with one possessing drugs necessarily 
constitutes constructive possession," Calogero said.

"The state . . . presented no evidence to show that the crack pipes were 
warm, that defendant's fingerprints were found on any of the drug 
paraphernalia, that defendant had ingested any cocaine, that defendant 
intended to ingest cocaine or that defendant was anything more than a guest 
in the residence," he said.

In its May decision, the appeals court said there was no evidence that 
Toups had bought one or both of the cocaine rocks on the coffee table, then 
lingered to socialize with Williams.

"Considering the evidence adduced at trial, one can only speculate as to 
what defendant was doing in the residence," the 4th Circuit said. "She 
could have been a nondrug-using member of a neighborhood church 
proselytizing defendants or an unrepentant crack addict preparing to 
prostitute herself in exchange for a rock of crack cocaine."

The 4th Circuit added it was clear that Williams, next to whom police found 
a plastic container with 17 pieces of cocaine inside, was the target of the 
police investigation. The evidence showed Williams had "dominion and 
control" over the drug in the container, as well as the two pieces of crack 
on the coffee table, the appeals court said.

Williams pleaded guilty in 2000 to possession of cocaine and was sentenced 
to three years in prison. He was released on parole in June, according to 
the state corrections department.

Toups received a four-year term because she had a prior felony conviction 
and was sentenced as repeat offender. She is slated to be released next 
year, according to her attorney, Kevin Boshea.

Boshea said he disagrees with the majority decision and added that many 
more drug cases like the one against Toups will be coming to the court. 
"This is not an uncommon situation, by any means," he said. It is obvious 
the court was "rather strongly divided as to the controlling jurisprudence 
in this area."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart