Pubdate: Mon, 14 Oct 2002
Source: Cincinnati Enquirer (OH)
Copyright: 2002 The Cincinnati Enquirer
Contact:  http://enquirer.com/today/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/86
Author: Peter Bronson
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?206 (Ohio Campaign for New Drug Policies)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/rehab.htm (Treatment)

THIS IS OHIO ON DRUGS

I always wondered whatever happened to the kids in junior high who sniffed 
airplane glue and paint thinner. Now I know. They went into politics and 
drafted Issue 1 on the Ohio Ballot this year.

Just take a look at the language of this state constitutional amendment to 
coddle crackheads and dope addicts, and you have to wonder if the people 
who dreamed it up have been working far too closely to uncapped bottles of 
White-Out.

The first thing you notice is that it would cost taxpayers about $250 
million over seven years to pay for treatment of drug offenders. Let me get 
this straight: A state that can't even afford a real Democratic Party is 
being asked to give $250 million to coke-snorters, smack-shooters and potheads?

It gets worse.

If it passes, repeat drug offenders with records as long as the chow line 
at Lucasville Prison could suddenly be magically reformed into "first-time 
offenders," eligible to dodge prison and take treatment.

That means prosecutors will lose their leverage to obtain plea bargains and 
get street hustlers to roll over on the big dealers who poison our cities 
and neighborhoods with drugs.

No drug testing is required to make sure they quit using drugs during 
treatment.

And once they are "treated," they can have all their criminal records 
sealed. What a deal. As the opponents point out, "School bus drivers, day 
care workers, airline pilots, nurses, doctors, pharmacists, teachers or 
construction workers would be able to conceal their drug offenses from 
current and future employers."

There's even a poke in the bloodshot-eye for boozers. If Issue 1 passes, a 
person busted for an alcohol-related crime could go to jail, while a junkie 
who does the same crime on drugs would skip the slammer and be sent to 
detention with a social worker.

The backers of Issue 1 say it would save $355 million in prison costs in 
six years. But opponents say drug offenders account for only about 3 
percent of prison inmates. Even if some money is saved after costs are 
subtracted, it's a steep price to pay for a liberal "feel-good" policy.

In Cincinnati, drug pushers are taking over quiet family neighborhoods and 
brazenly opening their "drug stores" in broad daylight. If Issue 1 passes, 
busting their customers would be a waste of time.

Issue 1 is not decriminalization of "soft" drugs such as pot. It's a "Just 
Say Yes" green light for traffic in hard drugs.

It gives criminals who thrive on the toxic drug culture a free pass. And 
once it is approved, it cannot be changed or repealed without another 
Constitutional Amendment.

Meanwhile, treatment spending is guaranteed - it has to be spent even if 
Ohio can't afford to run schools and prisons.

Gov. Bob Taft is adamantly against Issue 1. His Democratic opponent, Tim 
Hagen, is in favor.

It looks like Gov. Taft was doing his homework while other guys in junior 
high were sniffing glue.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D