Pubdate: Fri, 28 Jun 2002
Source: Honolulu Star-Bulletin (HI)
Copyright: 2002 Honolulu Star-Bulletin
Contact:  http://www.starbulletin.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/196
Author: Cynthia Tucker, of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Related: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n1149/a10.html

U.S. SHOULD QUIETLY END WAR ON DRUGS

(ATLANTA) There is little good news from the anti-terror front these days. 
The whereabouts of Osama bin Laden are still unknown; the entrenched 
Washington bureaucracy is fighting the new proposal for a Cabinet-level 
homeland defense department; and al-Qaida has regrouped to foment jihad in 
Kashmir, the area hotly contested by two new nuclear powers, India and 
Pakistan.

In other words, world affairs remain depressing.

Still, there was this small notice mixed in with recent news about 
reorganizing and retooling the FBI: The agency will scale back its efforts 
in the so-called war on drugs.  It comes as a relief -- a bit of good news 
- -- that the FBI has shifted its priorities away from corner crackheads and 
petty methamphetamine dealers.  With terrorists threatening to explode 
dirty bombs, spread smallpox and put cyanide in the water supply, it seems 
silly for a major law enforcement agency to expend its precious resources 
hunting down drug offenders.

The war on drugs, which always amounted to a war on drug users, has long 
been a form of official terrorism -- an overzealous effort to stop 
irresponsible Americans from abusing their own bodies.  Much like 
Prohibition, the war on drugs has created more problems than it has solved, 
incarcerating hundreds of thousands of nonviolent Americans and 
guaranteeing a black market, which, in turn, has sparked an epidemic of 
violence.

HAD THERE NOT been hefty profits in selling banned substances, drug gangs 
would not have sprung up to sell them and to war with each other as they 
fought over turf.  Similarly, there would be no South American cocaine 
cartels, which have earned enough profits from narco-trafficking to 
purchase armies to destabilize their native lands.

This seems as good a time as any for the White House and Congress to 
quietly end the war on drugs.  There is no great enthusiasm for it among 
average American voters. Why not go ahead and quietly ease back from a 
40-year "war" that the nation has no chance of winning?

While it would be politically risky for any formal announcement of 
retrenchment -- and even riskier to legalize banned substances -- the war 
on terror provides plenty of cover for scaling back.  For one thing, 
billions more will be needed to safeguard American soil from 
terrorists.  What better place to get it than from the money set aside for 
punitive anti-drug efforts -- from police raids to prison beds? The entire 
budget of the Drug Enforcement Administration, which has grown from $65 
million in 1972 to $1.8 billion this year, could be shifted to homeland 
defense.

With the nation's federal law enforcement agencies concentrating on 
terrorism, the abuse of illegal narcotics could be confronted logically, as 
a public health problem.  If America made a serious commitment to drug 
treatment and rehabilitation, rather than incarceration, our streets might 
actually be safer.  The violence of the drug war has largely been an 
unintended consequence of the law enforcement effort to squelch drug sales. 
(Again, see Prohibition.)

THAT'S NOT TO SAY that major drug cartels would disappear if police stopped 
going after petty drug dealers.  As long as there is money to be made from 
illegal drugs, criminal enterprises will hang around to reap the profits. 
The biggest and most dangerous of those criminal enterprises should always 
be in the gun sights of law enforcement officials.

But shifting money from the drug war to the war on terror will also 
interrupt some of those drug cartels.  As the U.S. Customs Service tightens 
borders to stop Islamist terrorists, inspecting packages, trucks, trains 
and container ships, it will inevitably stop more shipments of illegal 
drugs.  So why not beef up Customs with money from the DEA?

After more than 40 years of trying to stop Americans from using illegal 
narcotics -- wasting billions of dollars and countless lives in the process 
- -- U.S.  politicians and policy-makers ought to be ready for a new 
strategy. The war on terror has brought precious few blessings, but the 
opportunity to back away from the war on drugs is one.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Ariel