Pubdate: Mon, 16 Apr 2001
Source: The Southeast Missourian (MO)
Copyright: 2001 2001 Southeast Missourian
Contact: http://www.semissourian.com/opinion/speakout/submit/
Website: http://www.semissourian.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1322
Note: Letters of up to 250 words on topics of current interest are welcomed 
- - All letters will be edited - Names and hometowns of letter writers will 
be published.
Author: Tony Hall, Southeast Missourian
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine)

STALLED METH BILLS STARTING TO MOVE IN JEFF CITY

After weeks of going nowhere, new legislation to deal with Missouri's 
fastest growing narcotics problem is moving.

A bill designed to limit access to ingredients used to manufacture 
methamphetamine in the Missouri Senate got initial approval last week, and 
could get final approval this week.

Senate Bill 89, sponsored by Senate President Pro Tem Peter Kinder, R-Cape 
Girardeau, had received no action for several weeks until last Tuesday. 
Initially, the bill strengthened penalties for theft of anhydrous ammonia. 
But amendments from other meth-related bills have broadened its scope.

The amended version includes these additions:

Absolves farmers and others who lawfully store anhydrous ammonia from 
liability when thieves are injured.

Requires landlords and property owners to tell potential tenants or buyers 
whether the residence has been used as a meth lab.

Limits the amount of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine-containing cold tablets 
that may be sold or possessed at one time.

The bill would punish anyone who bought more than 96 pills containing 
ephedrine or pseudoephedrine with up to five years in prison. A similar 
sentence would be given if someone sold the medicine knowing that it would 
be used to make methamphetamine.

A law limiting possession of medicine containing ephedrine is logical, said 
Kevin Glaser, head of the Southeast Missouri Drug Task Force.

"Regardless of how sick you are, a normal person is not going to buy more 
than two boxes of cold tablets," he said. "You have these people who shop 
around and buy 1,500 to 2,000 tablets, and everybody and their brother 
knows what they're going to do with it."

Without a law making possession of a certain amount of the medicine a 
crime, narcotics officers have to find additional proof that the buyer 
plans to make meth, Glaser said.

Possession of more than five grams of ephedrine or more than 12 grams of 
pseudoephedrine would also be illegal. This would make it harder for meth 
makers to shop at several stores to accumulate a large amount of pills, 
Glaser said.

Lawful prescriptions, possession by medical professionals and sales between 
wholesalers and retailers would be exempt.

Theft of anhydrous ammonia becomes a more serious crime in the bill. The 
maximum penalty for any theft of anhydrous rises from five to seven years 
in prison.

Holding anhydrous ammonia in an unapproved container would become a new 
crime. Lawmakers consider this appropriate since the chemical is typically 
stored in bulk containers.

Little progress in House

Four meth-related bills in the Missouri House have made almost no progress 
since they were introduced. Rep. Peter Myers, R-Sikeston, has sponsored two 
of them.

Since his bills are nearly identical to Kinder's, Myers said he decided to 
wait for the Senate's version to come to the House rather than lobbying for 
his own. With the legislature's work slowing, Myers said a bill coming from 
the Senate now will have a better chance of passage.

The only meth bill that has been left behind is Senate Bill 90, a proposal 
of Kinder's that sought mandatory prison sentences for making 
methamphetamine. A first-time offender would get three years in prison, 
without the possibility of parole or a suspended sentence.

Legislators dismissed a mandatory sentencing policy, saying overcrowded 
prisons could not bear it, said Sen. Morris Westfall, R-Halfway, who is 
chairman of the Senate's criminal law committee.

As for the slow action on meth legislation, Westfall said Senate bills had 
been hung up in a budgetary committee that must determine if a piece of 
legislation is too expensive for the state.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D