Pubdate: Wed, 07 Mar 2001
Source: National Post (Canada)
Copyright: 2001 Southam Inc.
Contact:  300 - 1450 Don Mills Road, Don Mills, Ontario M3B 3R5
Fax: (416) 442-2209
Website: http://www.nationalpost.com/
Forum: http://forums.canada.com/~nationalpost
Author: Jim Bronskill, Southam News

BORDERS HAMPER CRIME FIGHTERS

Elite Unit Review

OTTAWA - International and provincial borders posed jurisdictional 
headaches that frustrated elite federal units set up to tackle organized 
crime, says a secret annual evaluation of the program.

The review of the Integrated Proceeds of Crime initiative for 1998-99 
chronicles the difficulties faced by Canadian authorities in a world where 
illicit activities straddle global boundaries.

Under the IPOC program, administered largely by the RCMP, specialized units 
in 13 Canadian cities zero in on the illegal proceeds of drug crimes, 
smuggling, fraud and gambling. The units include police, Crown counsel, 
customs officers, forensic accountants and tax investigators.

The report, which looked at the third year of the $180-million, five-year 
initiative, indicates the value of the program in dollars-and-cents terms 
had yet to be proven.

"IPOC investigations continue to be very costly and complex," says the 
evaluation. "While the benefits of integrated investigations were evident 
early in the initiative, the monetary effectiveness of the program remains 
unclear, particularly for the smaller units."

A declassified version of the report, prepared last March by the 
Solicitor-General's department, was obtained by Southam News under the 
Access to Information Act.

It reveals investigators were hampered by the absence of legislation that 
would provide for enforcement of a foreign forfeiture order in Canada.

The problem meant that an order originating abroad could not be enforced 
unless Canadian authorities undertook a second complete proceeds of crime 
investigation, says the report.  "The lengthy processes are costly and 
usually considered redundant and inefficient."

The evaluators note legislative work was underway to provide for easier 
enforcement.

However, another aggravation stemmed from the fact that, within Canada, 
fines or forfeitures that result from certain Criminal Code charges go to 
the province of jurisdiction and therefore cannot be shared with partners 
that assist with the probe.

For instance, a Montreal IPOC case involving money laundering and drug 
trafficking led to several arrests in Canada, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland 
and Costa Rica. The investigation was "one of the most arduous and complex" 
undertaken by the RCMP, costing $7.5-million and involving extensive 
physical and electronic surveillance.

Nine people pleaded guilty to possessing proceeds of crime and were fined 
about $3.6-million.

However, money recouped by authorities in Canada was slated solely for 
Quebec, since the province's laws specifically forbid asset-sharing with 
other jurisdictions, says the report.  "Unfortunately, asset sharing in 
Canada is not reciprocal, and is undertaken only by the federal government. 
While there have been some discussions regarding reciprocal arrangements, 
no province has expressed an interest in doing so."

The report notes the IPOC initiative is primarily a drug-related one, with 
90% of revenues and 80% of seizures related to drug investigations in 
1998-99. However, drug probes generated only 93 cents in revenue for each 
dollar spent during the time-frame, compared with $1.39 for each dollar in 
1997-98.

"This would indicate that such investigations are becoming significantly 
more expensive to conduct," says the report.

The evaluators stress that because investigations and prosecutions 
routinely take several years to complete, final tallies will not be 
apparent for some time.

Overall, the IPOC model has increased co-operation between law-enforcement 
agencies and has improved their capacity to target high levels of organized 
crime, notes the report.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth