Pubdate: Thu, 22 Feb 2001
Source: Beacon Journal, The (OH)
Copyright: 2001 The Beacon Journal Publishing Co.
Contact:  44 E. Exchange Street, P.O. Box 640, Akron OH 44328
Fax: (330) 996-3520
Feedback: http://www.ohio.com/bj/editorial/vop.html
Website: http://www.ohio.com/bj/
Forum: http://krwebx.infi.net/webxmulti/cgi-bin/WebX?abeacon

DARE TO IMPROVE

UA PROJECT AIMS TO CONFRONT DRUG USE BY OLDER KIDS

How do you prevent children and adolescents from abusing drugs, and when is 
the best time to reach them? At bottom, those are issues of first priority 
in a society bedeviled by drug abuse and in which enticing new drugs seem 
to sprout faster than dragon's teeth.

It is no surprise, then, that programs that target drug abuse among 
youngsters attract close scrutiny.

To answer the easier question: The best time to reach youngsters is before 
peer pressure and false sophistication prompt them to experiment with 
drugs. On that basis, school-based programs have become popular vehicles 
for drug-abuse prevention campaigns.

Of those programs, the 18-year-old DARE, Drug Abuse Resistance Education, 
used by about 75 percent of school districts nationwide, is the best known. 
Using police officers who make weekly classroom appearances, DARE offers 
lessons to fifth- and sixth-graders about recognizing and resisting the 
pressure to use drugs.

How effective is DARE in preventing adolescent drug use? Not very, 
according to researchers who say the program's impact fades as children get 
older. By their senior year in high school, students who went through DARE 
are just as likely to use illegal drugs as those who didn't.

Critics argue the program, largely a holdover from the ``Just Say No'' 
approach of the 1980s, is too simple, does not focus on older children who 
are more likely to be making those decisions and relies on lectures instead 
of more effective interactive methods, such as role-playing and discussion.

Also, the prevalence of drug abuse among teen-agers is confirmation that 
DARE, even if it were unquestionably effective, wouldn't be adequate to the 
task. For example, a study last year showed declining use of tobacco 
products, crack and powder cocaine among teen-agers. At the same time, the 
use of ecstasy increased across the board, as did heroin among 12th-graders 
and steroids among 10th-graders.

It isn't the shortcomings of DARE alone that offer an incentive to find 
improvements. Illegal drug labs are springing up in residential basements 
in Akron and elsewhere, the manufacturing process often as easy as 
following instructions on a Web site.

The challenge of finding a prevention program that is effective has been 
taken up by the University of Akron's Institute for Health and Social 
Policy, whose new program builds on DARE's content and extensive network of 
schools.

The UA program will target older children in the seventh and ninth grades 
and use interactive methods that have proved effective in other 
abuse-prevention programs, for example, encouraging students to question 
their own assumptions about drug use. A $13.5 million grant from the Robert 
Wood Johnson Foundation will permit the program to be implemented and 
evaluated in five cities across the country over the next five years.

DARE, critics contend, basked too long in the glow of novelty, without the 
candid and rigorous evaluation that would have identified its weaknesses 
sooner. The controlled program and critical evaluation that the UA program 
promises should help build a more effective model.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart