Pubdate: Sat, 01 Dec 2001
Source: Reason Magazine (US)
Issue: Volume 33, Issue 7, Starts on page 29
Copyright: 2001 The Reason Foundation
Website: http://www.reason.com/
Address: 3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA 90034-6064
Contact:  Jacob Sullum

DRUGS AND THUGS

The U.S. Subsidy For Terrorists

Shortly after the September terrorist attacks, House Speaker Dennis Hastert 
(R-Ill.) unveiled a new panel: the Speaker's Task Force for a Drug Free 
America. "The illegal drug trade is the financial engine that fuels many 
terrorist organizations around the world, including Osama bin Laden," he 
explained. "By going after the illegal drug trade, we reduce the ability of 
these terrorists to launch attacks against the United States."

Actually, "going after the illegal drug trade" is what allows terrorists to 
fund their operations with profits inflated by prohibition. In that sense, 
the $40 billion or so the U.S. spends on drug law enforcement each year 
represents a subsidy for murderers. Banning a product that people want 
creates an opportunity for criminals, who can earn big profits because they 
are willing to risk producing, transporting, and selling contraband.

This "risk premium" means cocaine and heroin sell for 20 to 40 times as 
much as they otherwise would. Prohibition thus delivers to armed thugs a 
handy stream of revenue, which they can dip into by selling drugs or by 
taxing producers and traffickers. Bin Laden's organization seems to have 
benefited from the drug trade indirectly: Opium money supports his Taliban 
hosts in Afghanistan.

Stronger enforcement, Hastert's favored solution, would tend to increase 
the risks of drug trafficking, eliminate competitors, and raise profits. So 
it hardly makes sense to fight terrorism by cracking down on drugs.

In fact, the events of September ii highlighted how the War on Drugs has 
skewed the government's priorities and compromised our security. The cost 
of focusing on traffickers instead of terrorists was illustrated by the 
announcement that federal drug agents would be trained to protect travelers 
because there aren't enough sky marshals. Given the government's failure to 
stop hijacked airliners from slamming into the World Trade Center, can it 
really afford to have so many personnel trying to stop illegal drugs from 
entering the U.S.?

It will not do simply to say that the War on Drugs and the War on Terrorism 
must be waged simultaneously. Aside from the problem that one war generates 
the black-market profits that help support our enemies in the other, we 
have to face the fact that our resources are finite. Every dollar spent 
intercepting drugs is a dollar that could be spent intercepting bombs. 
Every agent infiltrating a drug cartel is an agent who could be 
infiltrating a terrorist cell.

We have to ask ourselves which is scarier: a dealer who sells an intoxicant 
to a willing buyer or a terrorist who murders people at random. Confronting 
that question does not necessarily mean repealing prohibition (the approach 
I'd prefer), but it does mean taking into account the tradeoffs associated 
with the drug war.

That is something John P. Walters, President Bush's choice to head the 
Office of National Drug Control Policy, has shown little inclination to do. 
Walters, awaiting an all-but-certain Senate confirmation as of this 
writing, seems to be an unreconstructed drug war hawk. He has criticized 
the Clinton administration, under which drug arrests and anti-drug spending 
hit record levels, for being soft on drugs. Even as other conservatives 
concluded that prison cells were better used to incapacitate predatory 
criminals, he continued to support harsh mandatory sentences for nonviolent 
drug offenders.

Although the effort to "stop the flow of drugs" is plainly futile-managing, 
at best, to shift around smuggling routes and sources of supply-Walters 
apparently remains an interdiction enthusiast. He has even praised Peru's 
policy of shooting down suspected traffickers, a practice that took the 
lives of an American missionary and her baby last spring.

Perhaps recent events have tempered Walters' views by bringing home the 
point that America faces threats worse than drugs. Former DEA chief Robert 
C. Bonn, now the customs commissioner, seems to have seen the light. 
"Terrorism is our highest priority," he says, "bar none."

Senior Editor,Jacob Sullum  com) is writing a book on the 
morality of drug use.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth