Pubdate: Tue, 06 Nov 2001
Source: Scotsman (UK)
Copyright: The Scotsman Publications Ltd 2001
Contact:  http://www.scotsman.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/406
Author: Michelle Nichols
Cited: Legalise Cannabis Alliance  http://www.lca-uk.org
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis)

UK DRUG LAWS - MAKING A HASH OF IT

IT IS a campaign that has lasted nearly four decades and evolved from 
protests of the "flower power" period in the Sixties to a battle at 
the ballot box at the end of the last millennium.

While the non-medical use of cannabis was first banned in Britain in 
1928 - after South African and Egyptian delegates at an international 
conference on opium told other countries that cannabis was 
responsible for driving people mad - the cause for its legality in 
Britain was not taken up until the 1960s.

The suggestion that the drug led to people acting out of control had 
been popularised during the Thirties and Forties by Harry Anslinger, 
the head of the American Narcotics Bureau. To convince people that 
terrible crimes were committed by cannabis users, Mr Anslinger 
organised pamphlets, stories in the media and even a film called 
Reefer Madness.

However, at the time, cannabis was hardly used in Britain and up to 
the mid-Sixties was common only among the London jazz scene and some 
West Indian communities. But with the advent of the hippie period the 
use of cannabis grew rapidly among young university and college 
students.

The campaign reached a climax in 1967 when The Times newspaper 
published an advertisement signed by many prominent businessmen, 
musicians, writers and doctors calling for legalisation.

However, their efforts were to no avail and as part of the 
introduction of the Misuse of Drugs Act in 1973 the government 
decided that cannabis had no medical uses and banned it from 
prescription.

The drug's use spread to other social groups.  The reggae boom of the 
mid-Seventies saw a revival of the legalisation campaign, although it 
was not until the rise in drug use in the Nineties that it became a 
serious political issue.

It attained national political prominence during the 1997 general 
election when two candidates fought for a seat in parliament on a 
"legalise cannabis" platform.

There was no formal party structure uniting the candidates but there 
was a general public agreement on their policy.

On 28 September 1997, The Independent on Sunday newspaper, edited by 
Rosie Boycott, ran a 12-month campaign in favour of legalising 
cannabis.

The campaign gathered more pace and in March 1999 the Legalise 
Cannabis Alliance was registered as an official UK political party.

Although the few candidates who stood on behalf of the party managed 
to win only 1 or 2 per cent of the vote in their respective 
constituencies, public opinion polls throughout Britain revealed 
there was significant support for the decriminalisation of cannabis.

It is the most widely used illegal drug in Britain.  More than 8.5 
million people have tried it at least once, and the British Crime 
Survey for 1998 found that around half of men and a third of women 
aged between 16 and 29 had used cannabis.

The debate has covered many aspects with the strongest arguments 
being made for the legalising of cannabis for medicinal use. It is 
favoured as a form of relief by sufferers of painful illnesses like 
multiple sclerosis.

It was first introduced into Western medicine in the 1840s by a 
doctor who had been working in India and was used for painkilling 
purposes particularly in childbirth and for period pains. Rumour has 
it that Queen Victoria was prescribed cannabis by her doctor.

More recently, campaigners have complained that prosecuting people 
for possession, cultivation or dealing of cannabis was a waste of 
police resources and a breach of human rights. In 1998, more than 
90,000 people were caught in Britain committing cannabis offences.

Moving on to where the grass is greener. It is about time we had a 
rational debate on cannabis.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Josh