Pubdate: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 Source: Daily Iowan, The (IA Edu) Copyright: 2001 The Daily Iowan Contact: http://www.dailyiowan.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/937 Author: Holly Eggleston DRUG USE IN THE USA - A LICIT OR ILLICIT ESCAPE? I spent last week in a haze of drugs. Not a drug-induced haze, mind you! I spent substantial time discussing my admittedly unsubstantiated position on the third proposed Iowa City Charter Amendment (affectionately nicknamed the "catch-and-release program for hippies"). After listening to convincing, fiscally responsible arguments posed by several acquaintances in support of the amendment, I began to mull the implications of repealing government intervention in both legitimate and illegitimate drug businesses. I consulted several users (peers), a pharmacist, and a drug dealer. I became privy to a lexicon of drug terminology, various methods of getting high, and the entrepreneurial lure of dealing. I appreciated many of the fiscal arguments, being a libertine-leaning capitalist cheerleader. However, based on the moral ramifications and the tears drugs make in the fabric of American society, I cannot fully agree with my tutors' arguments. The pharmacist (a libertarian) believes that government regulation of the pharmaceutical industry is unfair to commerce. The profession benefits from a government-imposed monopoly. Pharmacists are the only ones who can legally sell otherwise illegal drugs. The profession creates a markup, and drug prices are astronomical, despite the lack of a corollary demand. If the pharmaceutical industry were deregulated, prices would drop. Democrats wouldn't be able to scare the geriatric into voting for them based prescription-drug issues. However, anyone could set up a "pharmacy" - -- scary thought. Government has its place in consumer protectionism. Really, a pharmacist is simply selling a drug that someone else prescribed. It is just as irresponsible to sell drugs without a license as it is to write (or self-administer) a prescription hastily dispatched to cover the aches and pains of real life. Prescription drugs are as much a way to escape reality as their illegal counterparts. Unless there is a real chemical imbalance warranting the use of prescription drugs, people should look into holistic methods of treatment or make the necessary lifestyle changes to deal with reality. We are a Prozac nation only because of neglect and the medical profession preying on the American consumer's need for a quick fix. And for the record, I'd like to add that I'm really disgusted by the images that Viagra ads conjure up. Decriminalization of illegal drugs would also benefit tax-paying consumers. We would no longer be waging a corrupt, ineffectual war on drugs. If legitimized, dealers would pay their fair share of taxes. Currently, dealers aren't liable for their product. Drug consumers would have rights and could take legal action against products laced with anything from B-12 to baking soda. Drug users are typically not hurting anyone but themselves. Taking drugs is exercising free will. Users claim they just want to use in peace. They feel they are not hurting anyone and should be left to their own natural progression of decadence. Is it our responsibility as a country to prevent people from pursuing happiness in a vial or pipe? The argument against decriminalization is that it is society's responsibility to protect innocent bystanders -- namely children -- from random drug-induced crimes. I grew up influenced by Nancy Reagan's "Just Say No" sloganeering and do not recommend the use of any drugs that are currently illegal. I'll digress a moment to avoid hypocrisy. I'm also trying hard to circumvent my talent of putting my foot in my mouth. A gag reflex prevents me from actually getting my lips around my size 8-Enzo-clad tootsie, but my Yoga lessons sure are paying off. I have not made the claim that I have never used drugs. I am a social drinker. I take an occasional hit off a friend's cigarette. I curse the Red Bull people daily for my Taurine dependency. I can't fully agree with the libertine arguments and endorse the use of the drugs that are currently illegal because I can't think of valid reasons for their incorporation in someone's life. Drugs help people escape reality. Though life may be hard sometimes, I would rather be awake than have the personality of a cucumber. Drugs make people stupid. I know so many people who daily hamper their potential, tarnishing their brilliance as they cloud their mind with drugs. Drugs may not kill irreplaceable brain cells, but they do make you less ambitious, lower inhibitions, and provide a gateway to a life that's less actualized. I'm all for the freedoms of commerce, but I am more for the freedoms of a safe, responsible, clear-minded America. - --- MAP posted-by: Rebel