Pubdate: Sun, 15 Jul 2001
Source: The Southeast Missourian (MO)
Copyright: 2001, Southeast Missourian
Contact: http://www.semissourian.com/opinion/speakout/submit/
Website: http://www.semissourian.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1322
Author: Arlene Levinson, Associated Press
http://www.mapinc.org/hea.htm (Higher Education Act)

BAN ON COLLEGE AID FOR THOSE WITH DRUG CONVICTIONS DRAWS FIRE

A ban on giving federal aid to college students with drug convictions could 
mean more than 34,000 people will be denied loans and grants in the coming 
school year -- more than triple those turned away in 2000-01.

The increase reflects a clarification in the U.S. Education Department's 
aid application, which screens for people with drug records. But the change 
has brought louder protests against the law: Even the measure's author says 
enforcement has been taken too far.

U.S. Rep. Mark Souder, an Indiana Republican, intended the aid ban to apply 
only to college students already getting loans or grants when convicted, an 
aide said.

Instead, education officials in the Clinton administration and now under 
President Bush are denying aid to people with previous drug convictions. 
Souder is trying to get them to change their enforcement efforts to match 
his intent, said Angela Flood, Souder's chief of staff.

U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., has introduced a bill seeking the law's 
repeal. Repeal is also the aim of the fledgling Students for Sensible Drug 
Policy and its 140 campus chapters.

Higher education leaders are protesting, too.

The law is "fundamentally flawed," and amounts to "double punishment" -- 
and bias -- against low-and middle-income students who must undergo 
screening while their wealthier peers do not, the head of the American 
Council on Education wrote in May to U.S. Rep. Asa Hutchinson, R-Ark. 
Hutchinson is Bush's nominee to run the Drug Enforcement Administration.

What Congress asked for

The education agency is only doing what Congress asked, said Lindsey 
Kozberg, Education Department spokeswoman.

"Consistent with the department's overall position, we seek applications 
from students that are complete and accurate, so we can provide aid to as 
many eligible students as possible," she said.

The law, approved in 1998, bars federal grants, work-study money and 
U.S.-backed and subsidized student loans to anyone convicted of selling or 
possessing drugs.

For a first drug-possession offense, ineligibility lasts a year after 
conviction; for a second offense, two years. More convictions bar aid 
indefinitely.

The law is tougher on traffickers. A single drug sale conviction means aid 
ineligibility for two years; more than that and the ban is indefinite. Aid 
can be restored if a student undergoes drug rehabilitation.

Enforcement starts when an applicant fills out the Free Application for 
Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA. Question 35 on the 2001-02 aid form: "Have 
you ever been convicted of possessing or selling illegal drugs?"

A "yes" brings a second form in the mail, asking for details to determine 
if the aid ban applies in this case.

Those who fail to answer question 35 are asked again. If they still don't 
answer, aid is automatically denied.

Phrasing on last year's form confused people: "If you have never been 
convicted of any illegal drug offense, enter '1' in the box."

10 million applications

A total of 9,548 people were still denied aid in the 2000-01 cycle, but 
they were the applicants who admitted to having drug convictions.

This year, the government expects 10 million aid applications. Among 6.8 
million so far, 34,096 will likely be denied student aid, officials said.

While 21,993 disclosed a drug conviction making them ineligible, another 
12,103 failed to answer the drug question.

Unknown is how many the law scares off.

"Many people will not apply because they're not eligible, or they think 
they're not eligible," said Corye Barbour, lobbyist at the United States 
Student Association. "We don't have any way to estimate them."
- ---
MAP posted-by: GD