Pubdate: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 Source: Redding Record Searchlight (CA) Copyright: 2000 Redding Record Searchlight - E.W. Scripps Contact: PO Box 492397, Redding, CA 96049-2397 Website: http://www.redding.com/ Forum: http://www.redding.com/disc2_frm.htm 'MEDIPOT' PATIENT GETS HASSLE BEFORE JUSTICE CAN PREVAIL Shasta County's saga of prosecuting medicinal marijuana patients hit a new low last week when a disabled man was ordered into a courtroom for possessing several joints' worth of the drug. Superior Court Judge Gregory Caskey did the right thing Monday when he wasted little time and dismissed the case against Frank Port, a 29-year-old Anderson man who has skeletal birth defects. Port, who uses a wheelchair, has his doctor's permission to use marijuana for his condition under voter-approved Proposition 215. As Port's attorney, Janice Mackey of Redding, pointed out: "The choice is marijuana or suicide." Senior Deputy District Attorney Brent Ledford asked for the dismissal as Caskey was examining the pot recommendation from Port's doctor. Throwing out the misdemeanor charge at the settlement conference was a no-brainer. It's a wonder a case such as this even made it into a courtroom. Ledford indicated Thursday that dismissal was appropriate. "Our job is to do justice," he said. From a layman's perspective, justice would have been better served if Port didn't have to fight the charge and recruit an attorney in the first place. Ledford wouldn't say it was a mistake to charge Port because his case also involved two caregivers who are charged with marijuana trafficking. Port and the caregivers were stopped in a van on May 3 in Redding while they allegedly were hauling 24 marijuana plants intended for a garden. Port said Redding police confiscated 40 grams of marijuana from him, but he was only charged with possessing 2 grams. Police returned six plants the next day to one of the caregivers and another patient who is not charged in the case. Possessing three indoor plants apiece follows informal guidelines adopted by the Redding Police Department and Shasta County Sheriff's Office for medical marijuana. What remains to be seen is how the Shasta County court system will deal with the two caregivers under the proposition. They are due in court next month for separate hearings. Transportation and cultivation of marijuana is not addressed under Proposition 215, Ledford said. What's more, there's no allowance under federal law for a caregiver to grow marijuana. So Shasta County muddles along without clear direction from the state on how to handle these "medipot" cases. It's a shame that legitimate card-carrying medical pot patients like Frank Port aren't left alone as the Compassionate Use Act intended. - --- MAP posted-by: greg