Pubdate: Fri, 29 Dec 2000
Source: Bergen Record (NJ)
Copyright: 2000 Bergen Record Corp.
Contact:  150 River St., Hackensack, NJ 07601
Fax: (201) 646-4749
Feedback: http://www.bergen.com/cgi-bin/feedback
Website: http://www.bergen.com/
Author: Lynne M. Kook
Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1820/a02.html

ON MARIJUANA AS MEDICINE

I agree that scientific studies on medical uses of marijuana are long 
overdue ("Medical marijuana," Editorial, Dec. 5). However, I question 
whether testing marijuana as a medicine is even practical.

Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the most active ingredient in pot, has been 
available since the 1980s in synthetic pill form called Marinol. Testing 
has been completed on this product. One of the drawbacks is that Marinol 
takes a few hours to become effective, and then it is almost impossible to 
maintain at therapeutic levels in the bloodstream. A cigarette is an 
efficient drug delivery system. The chemicals reach the bloodstream in 
seconds and then go directly to the brain. The user can regulate the 
effects puff by puff.

We know of marijuana's effectiveness largely from the testimonials of sick 
people who say it is the only treatment that works to relieve their 
suffering. This fact should be sufficiently satisfactory evidence to 
regulators.

Patients have already stated that marijuana relieves their pain and helps 
stop weight and appetite loss. How many more studies are needed and at what 
cost? It is my understanding Canada began clinical trials in 1999. What are 
the results of those studies?

At issue is the job of making marijuana an official prescription medicine. 
In its natural form, it cannot be patented. Therefore, drug companies have 
not undertaken the costly testing and could stand to lose millions on their 
products should it become legal to distribute as a medicine. Once again, it 
is the patient who loses out to the interests of the big lobbyists.

Lynne M. Kook, Palisades Park, Dec. 10

The writer is a registered nurse.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D