Pubdate: Wed, 06 Dec 2000
Source: San Francisco Chronicle (CA)
Copyright: 2000 San Francisco Chronicle
Contact:  901 Mission St., San Francisco CA 94103
Feedback: http://www.sfgate.com/select.feedback.html
Website: http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/
Forum: http://www.sfgate.com/conferences/
Page: A27
Author: Debra J. Saunders

A SENSIBLE SALVO IN THE 'WAR ON DRUGS'

Michael Levine worked as a federal narcotics officer for 35 years. He
worked undercover in a Brazilian drug cartel. His brother, David, was a
junkie, who killed himself after 19 years of addiction to heroin. David's
suicide note said, "I am sorry . . . I can't stand the drugs any longer."
Levine's son, a New York City cop, was murdered by a drug addict who was
out on parole for two previous homicides.

Levine could be the last man you would expect to contribute to a book
critical of America's war on drugs. Yet, he wrote a chapter for "After
Prohibition: An Adult Approach to Drug Policies in the 21st Century,"
published by the libertarian Cato Institute and edited by Cato analyst
Timothy Lynch.

Other contributors to the book include New Mexico Republican Gov. Gary E.
Johnson and Julie Stewart, whose brother, Jeff, was arrested in 1990 for
growing marijuana. As Stewart writes, Jeff's accomplices -- who both had
prior felony convictions -- informed on her brother. They got probation;
Jeff got a five-year federal sentence. An outraged Julie Stewart formed
Families Against Mandatory Minimums, which opposes draconian federal
mandatory minimum sentences in favor of judicial discretion.

Contributors have conflicting views on revamping the drug war. Gov. Johnson
favors not just decriminalizing all drugs, but legalizing and regulating
them. A teetotaler, who stays away from drugs, tobacco and candy bars,
Johnson is anti-drug. But he believes that "by legalizing drugs, we can
control them, regulate them and tax them."

Johnson writes: "Under a legalized scenario, we would see the level of drug
use remain the same or decline. And the same would happen with respect to
drug abuse." He's wrong. Take away the legal stigma and more people will
use drugs.

Still, the governor makes a strong point when he compares the annual death
toll related to alcohol (150,000 deaths) and tobacco (450,000 deaths) to
the death tolls of marijuana (few, but uncounted) and drugs such as cocaine
(fewer than 3,000 deaths).

Levine rejects the Johnson model, except apparently for marijuana and
similar drugs. "Certain soft drugs may be legalized with no downside worse
than alcohol, but I am convinced that the hard stuff like crack, coke,
heroin, angel dust, methamphetamine, LSD, ecstasy and dozens of others
simply cannot be legalized in a sane society."

Levine recommends changing the focus of law enforcement from going after
dealers to going after users. "If the history of the drug war has shown us
anything, it is that no matter how draconian the law, drug dealers are not
impressed," Levine writes.

Better to target the casual user. Teachers, lawyers and salesmen were
terrified when they were busted in a pilot program. Levine doesn't want to
lock them up in prison; he suggests mandatory treatment. Going after casual
users, he argues, really dries up demand.

But federal drug biggies aren't buying. They like the system as it is, even
if it doesn't work.

The book's goal is to drum some sense into Washington, especially on the
right. Capitol Hill's current approach is all rhetoric -- Lynch lampoons a
proposed bill called "The Drug-Free Century Act" -- and no victory.

The last time D.C. Republicans tried "to do something thoughtful on crime
issues," Stewart noted, the Dems "slammed" them. Stewart hopes that
Republicans -- in the "Only Nixon Can Go to China" mode -- will reach out
to Democrats to reduce sentences that can put small-time drug operators
behind bars longer than murderers.

In the long run, Washington should be looking at what works and what
doesn't. In the meantime, more sensible sentencing laws and prosecutorial
practices would go a long way.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Eric Ernst