Pubdate: Wed, 30 Aug 2000
Source: Washington Post (DC)
Copyright: 2000 The Washington Post Company
Contact:  1150 15th Street Northwest, Washington, DC 20071
Feedback: http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/edit/letters/letterform.htm
Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/

THE COLOMBIA COMMITMENT

As he visits beleaguered Colombia today, President Clinton faces a new 
crescendo of opposition, both Colombian and American, to his plan for $1.3 
billion in largely military aid to Colombia. And much of what the critics 
say is true. Though the declared U.S. enemies in Colombia--drug production 
and the Marxist guerrillas who profit from it--represent real problems, 
they are hardly the only factors destabilizing Colombian democracy. 
Government corruption, much of it drug-related, is rampant.

The unemployment rate is an intolerable 20 percent.

Torture and murder by government forces or allied paramilitary groups go 
unpunished. Colombia suffers from a comprehensive social and political 
breakdown, which only the resolve of its own people, not foreign aid, can 
ultimately correct.

And yet we cannot agree with those--including prominent human rights groups 
that have protested the president's decision to waive human rights 
conditions on the aid for this year--who oppose the president's Plan 
Colombia, with its heavy emphasis on drug crop eradication and a new 
military offensive against the guerrillas. Currently, the 15,000-man rebel 
army, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), is better funded 
and equipped than the government's own forces.

As a result, a large portion of Colombia's territory has fallen under the 
control of a group that traffics heavily in cocaine and heroin, kidnaps and 
murders innocent people (including three American citizens) and, if it ever 
took power, would set up a dictatorship based on Marxist ideology.

In a recent poll, nearly half of Colombians said they consider the FARC 
commander, Manuel Marulanda, to be the most powerful man in their country; 
other polls show that he has almost no public support.

Small wonder that thousands of middle-class Colombians, democracy's core 
constituency, are abandoning their country.

And small wonder that Mr. Marulanda has refused to bargain seriously with 
the government, even though President Andres Pastrana ceded large 
territories to the guerrillas to jump-start a peace process.

Talk of "another Vietnam" in Colombia is irresponsible hyperbole.

Mr. Clinton's plan, which has won the support of the Republican Congress, 
envisions no introduction of U.S. combat forces, and it includes a 
substantial amount of money to shore up the legal system and address other 
social and economic ills. (The United States could do even more to help the 
Colombian economy by removing certain trade barriers, as Mr. Pastrana is 
asking.) The military aid is also conditioned on the Colombian forces' 
human rights performance, and presumably the next president will not waive 
those conditions if American-trained troops commit atrocities.

But there is an irreducible military element to Colombia's plight; the 
country needs to restore governmental control over all its territory, and 
it needs the capability to put enough heat on the FARC--and its sources of 
drug money--so that the guerrillas have no choice but to bargain in good 
faith. Only the United States is in a position to help Colombia do this. 
Such a course carries costs and risks--including the risk of bloody 
failure--but so would a decision to leave Colombia to its own devices.

The president and Congress are right to have made this commitment. Mr. 
Clinton's trip, albeit brief, is an important demonstration that, however 
daunting Colombia's problems may be, the United States will not just walk 
away from them.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D